Nunn C updated, Pyramid games

[Heinz van Kempen]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 16 February 2004 17:22:15:

Hi all ,
Nunn C tournament is updated.
Results from the Pyramid below. Last reminder for the deadline to participate: today midnight. There is another top match. Anaconda vs. Aristarch. Cheetah from CCT6 also wants to participate.
It is sufficient to apply only once to be in for all cycles automatically.
WildCat 3.0 480 games Nunn gauntlet later this evening.
Best Regards
Heinz
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/
Frenzee 151 - Patzer 3.61 0.5:0.5
no position change
Frenzee with aggressive play in early middlegame. After exchange of queens, it invaded the seventh rank to add some pressure to f7, already threatend by bishop and knight. Regrettably Frenzee did not manage to keep one pawn in the endgame to win easily and the game ended in a draw with this nasty K,R,N vs. K,R endgame where there is rarely a win, except when the enemy king is already restricted to a corner or near the border.
Frenzee 151 - Patzer 3.61 [D27]

1.d4 0 1...d5 0 2.c4 0 2...dxc4 0 3.Nf3 0 3...Nf6 0 4.e3 0 4...e6 0 5.Bxc4 0 5...c5 0 6.0-0 0 6...a6 0 7.a4 0 7...Nc6 0 8.Qe2 0 8...cxd4 0 9.Rd1 0 9...Be7 0 10.exd4 0 10...0-0 0 11.Nc3 0 11...Na5 0.62/10 47 12.Ba2 0.44/12 42 12...Bb4 (Te8) 0.89/10 49 13.d5 (Lg5) 0.75/12 41 13...Qe8 (exd5) 0.87/10 48 14.Qc2 (Dd3) 0.87/12 41 14...exd5 1.01/10 46 15.Bg5 1.11/13 41 15...Be7 1.62/11 77 16.Bxf6 1.10/13 41 16...Bxf6 1.75/12 85 17.Nxd5 1.03/12 34 17...Bd8 1.84/12 41 18.Re1 (Sg5) 0.81/12 179 18...Qc6 1.14/11 29 19.Qe4 (Dd2) 0.96/11 35 19...Qg6 (Dh6) 1.12/12 46 20.Qxg6 1.39/13 35 20...hxg6 1.70/13 36 21.Ne7+ 1.44/14 35 21...Bxe7 2.15/15 94 22.Rxe7 1.44/13 12 22...Nc6 2.15/14 5 23.Rc7 (Se5) 1.39/14 37 23...Bg4 (Tb8) 2.04/13 29 24.Ng5 (Sh4) 1.47/13 31 24...Nd8 2.01/12 10 25.f3 (h3) 1.55/14 37 25...Bf5 2.84/15 40 26.a5 1.50/14 37 26...Rb8 2.85/14 31 27.Re1 (Td1) 1.51/13 44 27...b6 2.82/14 29 28.Ree7 (g4) 1.46/13 31 28...bxa5 3.15/15 44 29.g4 (Sxf7) 1.96/13 40 29...Rxb2 (Ld3) 1.57/12 4 30.gxf5 2.69/14 37 30...Rxa2 4.62/14 90 31.fxg6 2.76/14 12 31...Rd2 5.06/13 58 32.gxf7+ 2.90/14 40 32...Nxf7 4.93/15 48 33.Rxf7 2.61/14 40 33...Rxf7 4.75/15 21 34.Nxf7 2.65/14 35 34...a4 4.71/15 20 35.Ng5 2.61/14 30 35...g6 4.78/14 26 36.Rc3 2.68/13 26 36...Kg7 (Tb2) 4.85/13 23 37.Ra3 2.95/14 23 37...Rd5 4.93/15 23 38.f4 (Se4) 3.17/15 20 38...Ra5 5.10/15 21 39.Nf3 3.26/15 18 39...Kf6 5.18/14 19 40.Ne5 (Kf2) 3.35/16 118 40...Kf5 4.98/13 19 41.Nc4 (Kg2) 3.33/16 71 41...Rc5 5.06/15 35 42.Rxa4 3.45/16 67 42...Kxf4 5.06/14 36 43.Nd2+ 3.45/14 63 43...Kf5 5.12/16 40 44.Rxa6 3.49/14 59 44...Rc2 5.15/15 32 45.Ra5+ (Sf3) 3.54/14 56 45...Kg4 5.17/16 70 46.Ra4+ 3.61/14 47 46...Kh3 5.20/17 34 47.Nf3 (Ta3+) 3.57/15 53 47...Rc1+ 5.00/17 32 48.Kf2 3.57/14 15 48...Rc2+ 5.00/16 4 49.Ke3 3.57/14 46 49...g5 5.00/16 49 50.Ra7 3.57/13 43 50...Rc3+ 4.90/16 49 51.Ke4 (Kf2) 3.57/14 40 51...g4 2.23/14 35 52.Rh7+ 3.57/14 38 52...Kg2 2.23/2 0 53.Rg7 3.57/14 36 53...Rc4+ (Kh3) 0.75/12 6 54.Nd4 (Ke3) 3.57/14 34 54...Kxh2 0.82/12 4 55.Rxg4 3.57/13 11 55...Kh3 0.00/1 0 56.Rg7 (Tg5) 0.00/1 0 56...Rc5 0.00/1 0 57.Nf5 (Tf7) 0.00/1 0 57...Rc4+ 0.00/1 0 58.Nd4 (Kd5) 0.00/1 0 58...Rc5 0.00/1 0 59.Nf5 (Tf7) 0.00/1 0 59...Rc4+ 0.00/1 0 60.Nd4 0.00/1 0 ½-½
Terra 3.3B5 - Comet B68 0:1
no position change
Terra started well with a good queen side initiative, 24.c5! and grabbing the open b-file. But this slowly vanished and finally after 37..Bxh3 Comet got the upper hand. Better alternatives for white at first sight seem 35.Re2 Bf5 36.Rxc5 Rxa5 37.Rxa5 Nxc4 38.Rxe8 Nxa5 being the exchange down, but with free pawns (unclear). Instead of 38.Rxe5 maybe better 38.Rdd5 Nf3+ 39.Kh1 Bg4 40.gxf3 Bxf3 41.Kh2 Bxd5 42.Rxd5 Re1 43.Bd3 Ra1 44.Nc4 Ra4 45.Rd7 (looks drawish).
Terra 3.3B5 - Comet B68 [E92]
1.d4 0 1...Nf6 0 2.Nf3 0 2...g6 0 3.c4 0 3...Bg7 0 4.Nc3 0 4...0-0 0 5.e4 0 5...d6 0 6.Be2 0 6...e5 0 7.d5 0 7...a5 0 8.Bg5 0 8...h6 0 9.Bh4 0 9...Na6 0 10.Nd2 0 10...Qe8 0 11.0-0 0 11...Nh7 0 12.a3 0 12...Bd7 0 13.Nb5 0.13/12 99 13...Bf6 (Sg5) 0.24/10 58 14.Bxf6 0.17/14 52 14...Nxf6 0.24/10 12 15.Qb3 (Dc2) 0.14/13 51 15...Qe7 0.13/10 45 16.Qe3 0.17/12 50 16...Kg7 (g5) 0.20/10 41 17.b3 (Tfb1) 0.12/10 50 17...Rh8 (g5) 0.20/9 49 18.Ra2 (Tfb1) 0.14/10 50 18...h5 (Sh7) 0.05/10 57 19.h3 (f3) 0.12/10 52 19...Rhg8 (h4) 0.02/9 53 20.Rfa1 0.19/11 48 20...Rgb8 (Kh7) 0.13/9 45 21.b4 (Sc3) 0.23/11 47 21...Rd8 (Tc8) 0.23/9 54 22.Nc3 (Df3) 0.27/10 50 22...b6 (Df8) 0.47/11 82 23.Rb1 0.49/10 47 23...Nb8 0.51/10 62 24.c5 (Taa1) 0.54/12 56 24...dxc5 0.64/10 32 25.bxc5 0.66/13 35 25...Qxc5 0.59/11 42 26.Qxc5 0.61/14 35 26...bxc5 0.81/11 12 27.Nf3 (Sc4) 0.78/13 35 27...c6 0.71/12 61 28.Nxe5 0.79/13 35 28...cxd5 1.00/12 95 29.exd5 0.81/12 34 29...Bf5 (Lc8) 1.13/11 49 30.Rb5 1.13/13 89 30...Re8 (Se4) 1.05/11 37 31.Nc4 1.03/12 23 31...Nbd7 1.34/11 44 32.Nxa5 (Td2) 1.18/12 23 32...Ne4 1.07/11 33 33.Nxe4 1.09/12 23 33...Bxe4 0.93/12 58 34.Bc4 (d6) 1.18/12 24 34...Ne5 (h4) 1.15/11 26 35.Bf1 (Te2) 0.86/13 24 35...Bxd5 (Sd7) 0.29/12 38 36.Rd2 0.46/13 25 36...Be6 0.24/11 14 37.Rxc5 (Le2) 0.45/12 25 37...Bxh3 (Sd7) 0.33/11 21 38.Rxe5 (Te2) 0.89/12 28 38...Rxe5 -0.38/11 3 39.Nc4 0.65/15 26 39...Rg5 -1.24/12 11 40.f4 0.50/14 21 40...Rg4 (Tg3) -1.28/13 16 41.Rd4 0.26/14 54 41...Ra6 -1.48/13 30 42.Kh2 (Kf2) 0.03/13 40 42...Bxg2 -1.74/13 38 43.Bxg2 (Le2) 0.00/14 39 43...Rf6 -1.74/13 43 44.Rd7 (Se3) -0.30/12 40 44...Rfxf4 -1.96/13 64 45.Ne3 -0.55/13 39 45...Rg5 (Td4) -2.07/12 29 46.Rd3 -0.52/13 38 46...Kh6 (Tf2) -2.19/12 47 47.Kh3 -0.64/11 37 47...h4 -2.47/12 35 48.Nd1 -0.80/14 39 48...Rfg4 -2.61/13 40 49.Bf3 (Lc6) -0.90/14 36 49...Rg3+ (Ta4) -3.03/13 21 50.Kxh4 -0.92/17 36 50...R5g4+ -3.03/13 40 51.Bxg4 0.01/2 0 51...Rxd3 -3.11/14 39 52.Be2 -1.06/17 37 52...Rxa3 -3.12/12 38 53.Kg4 -0.96/15 37 53...f5+ -3.29/12 46 54.Kf4 -1.02/15 36 54...Ra4+ (Ta2) -3.29/12 37 55.Ke3 (Kg3) -1.02/16 36 55...g5 -3.49/10 23 56.Bb5 -1.05/13 35 56...Ra5 (f4+) -3.59/10 36 57.Bc6 -1.09/13 35 57...Kh5 (f4+) -3.62/10 36 58.Nb2 (Sf2) -1.38/13 35 58...Ra3+ -3.75/10 35 59.Kd4 -1.41/14 29 59...g4 -4.02/11 36 60.Nc4 -1.44/13 28 60...Ra2 -3.96/10 33 61.Ne5 (Ke3) -1.60/12 29 61...g3 (f4) -4.13/10 21 62.Nd3 -1.64/14 28 62...Kg4 (Kg5) -4.25/10 24 63.Ne1 -1.65/14 28 63...Rf2 (Ta1) -4.41/10 29 64.Kd3 -3.83/14 40 64...Kh3 -5.90/11 18 65.Kd4 -7.54/14 27 65...f4 -10.60/11 24 66.Nd3 (Ld7+) -9.94/14 57 66...Rd2 -16.68/11 21 67.Bd7+ -9.94/13 48 67...Kh2 -23.87/11 32 0-1
Movei 00_8_163 - Knight Dreamer 3.2 1:0
new positions:
Movei 27
Knight Dreamer 31
Movei 00_8_163 - Knight Dreamer 3.2 [D27]
Movei with active play 13.d5!?. Knight Dreamer with a severe blunder directly after the opening 14...g6?? (instead of 14..h6 for example). The game was already decided with 15.Bg5. Somehow Uri knew (I suppose from his choice) that Knight Dreamer is much weaker with longer time controls. In fact after a few hundred games in my rating lists Knight Dreamer is 51 Elo points weaker with longer time controls. There are others where it is the other way round, like Quark and Comet for example.
1.d4 0 1...d5 0 2.c4 0 2...dxc4 0 3.Nf3 0 3...Nf6 0 4.e3 0 4...e6 0 5.Bxc4 0 5...c5 0 6.0-0 0 6...a6 0 7.a4 0 7...Nc6 0 8.Qe2 0 8...cxd4 0 9.Rd1 0 9...Be7 0 10.exd4 0 10...0-0 0 11.Nc3 0 11...Na5 0.17/11 36 12.Ba2 (d5) 0.39/11 34 12...Qb6 (Sd5) 0.24/11 36 13.d5 (Le3) 0.48/11 44 13...Bc5 0.30/11 36 14.Qc2 (Lg5) 0.58/10 20 14...g6 (Ld7) 0.25/11 36 15.Bg5 (Lf4) 1.78/11 13 15...Ng4 1.58/11 36 16.Ne4 2.36/11 18 16...Bb4 2.40/11 86 17.h3 2.96/12 49 17...h6 (f6) 2.92/11 91 18.Bc1 3.35/12 46 18...exd5 2.89/11 33 19.Bxd5 3.45/12 40 19...Nxf2 2.98/11 33 20.Qxf2 3.54/11 22 20...Qxf2+ 3.06/12 33 21.Kxf2 3.54/10 22 21...Kh7 (Kg7) 3.20/12 33 22.Bf4 3.49/11 36 22...f5 3.28/12 33 23.Nd6 (Tac1) 3.79/11 27 23...g5 3.33/12 33 24.Be5 3.89/11 18 24...Bc5+ (Sc6) 3.77/12 34 25.Kf1 4.08/12 17 25...Bxd6 4.08/12 34 26.Bxd6 4.18/13 25 26...Re8 4.21/12 34 27.b4 (Tac1) 4.15/12 43 27...Nc6 4.15/13 34 28.Rac1 (b5) 4.12/13 91 28...Be6 (g4) 4.03/11 34 29.b5 (Txc6) 4.11/13 26 29...axb5 (Lxd5) 4.10/12 35 30.axb5 4.35/12 19 30...Bxd5 4.34/12 35 31.Rxd5 4.44/12 42 31...Nd8 4.35/12 35 32.Rc7+ 4.48/11 47 32...Kg6 4.40/11 36 33.Ne5+ (Le5) 4.82/11 55 33...Kf6 4.93/11 36 34.Rh7 4.94/11 35 34...Ra1+ (Txe5) 5.14/12 36 35.Kf2 5.46/11 20 35...Ra2+ 5.56/11 37 36.Kg1 (Kf3) 5.64/12 134 36...g4 (h5) 5.84/11 62 37.hxg4 6.29/10 25 37...Ra1+ (Ke6) 7.10/10 62 38.Kh2 6.74/11 59 38...Rf1 7.68/10 48 39.Bc7 (Tc5) 7.28/11 50 39...Rxe5 8.58/11 19 40.Bxe5+ 7.75/11 61 40...Kg5 (Ke6) 0.01/1 0 41.Rg7+ 99.97/1 0 41...Kh4 0.01/1 0 42.Bg3# 99.99/1 0 1-0

[Peter Fendrich]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Peter Fendrich at 17 February 2004 00:18:33:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Nunn C updated, Pyramid games geschrieben von: / posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 16 February 2004 17:22:15:

Hi all ,
Nunn C tournament is updated.
Results from the Pyramid below. Last reminder for the deadline to participate: today midnight. There is another top match. Anaconda vs. Aristarch. Cheetah from CCT6 also wants to participate.
It is sufficient to apply only once to be in for all cycles automatically.
WildCat 3.0 480 games Nunn gauntlet later this evening.
Best Regards
Heinz
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/

- snip -
Hello Heinz,
Comet just waited and played his normal solid style...
Where did you produce this notation?
I couldn't get it accepted as input by any of my programs!
/Peter

[Will Singleton]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Will Singleton at 17 February 2004 00:30:39:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: Nunn C updated, Pyramid games geschrieben von: / posted by: Peter Fendrich at 17 February 2004 00:18:33:

Hi all ,
Nunn C tournament is updated.
Results from the Pyramid below. Last reminder for the deadline to participate: today midnight. There is another top match. Anaconda vs. Aristarch. Cheetah from CCT6 also wants to participate.
It is sufficient to apply only once to be in for all cycles automatically.
WildCat 3.0 480 games Nunn gauntlet later this evening.
Best Regards
Heinz
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/

- snip -
Hello Heinz,
Comet just waited and played his normal solid style...
Where did you produce this notation?
I couldn't get it accepted as input by any of my programs!
/Peter

Winboard wouldn't accept the amateur-mad game, illegal move 42.O-O. Seems like it should comment out some of the extra info. I think.
Will

[Heinz van Kempen]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 17 February 2004 00:39:53:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: Nunn C updated, Pyramid games geschrieben von: / posted by: Will Singleton at 17 February 2004 00:30:39:

Winboard wouldn't accept the amateur-mad game, illegal move 42.O-O. Seems like it should comment out some of the extra info. I think.
Will

Hello Will, hello Peter,
all games from the pyramid so far will be downloadable tomorrow from my page. With those I put in there you had no probs so far, I suppose?
Best Regards
Heinz

[Heinz van Kempen]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 17 February 2004 05:31:46:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: Nunn C updated, Pyramid games geschrieben von: / posted by: Peter Fendrich at 17 February 2004 00:18:33:

Hello Heinz,
Comet just waited and played his normal solid style...
Where did you produce this notation?
I couldn't get it accepted as input by any of my programs!
/Peter

Hello Peter,
yes, seems to be complicated when comments are added. So all Pyramid games so far are now in download section of my homepage and also WildCat 3.0 gauntlet results and games available.


New pyramid results February 17th:
40 moves in 20 min.
Quark 2.35 vs. LambChop 10.88       0:1
Comet B68 vs. Tao 5.4               1:0
The Baron CCT 6 vs. Ikarus 0.18     1/2
(got new Baron version only after game was already played)
DanChess 1.0.4 vs. Gothmog 0.4.6e   0:1
(hope that Daniel will come up with a rewritten new public version before next cycle)


Best Regards
Heinz
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/

[Uri Blass]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Uri Blass at 17 February 2004 08:29:48:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Nunn C updated, Pyramid games geschrieben von: / posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 16 February 2004 17:22:15:

Hi all ,
Nunn C tournament is updated.
Results from the Pyramid below. Last reminder for the deadline to participate: today midnight. There is another top match. Anaconda vs. Aristarch. Cheetah from CCT6 also wants to participate.
It is sufficient to apply only once to be in for all cycles automatically.
WildCat 3.0 480 games Nunn gauntlet later this evening.
Best Regards
Heinz
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/
Frenzee 151 - Patzer 3.61 0.5:0.5
no position change
Frenzee with aggressive play in early middlegame. After exchange of queens, it invaded the seventh rank to add some pressure to f7, already threatend by bishop and knight. Regrettably Frenzee did not manage to keep one pawn in the endgame to win easily and the game ended in a draw with this nasty K,R,N vs. K,R endgame where there is rarely a win, except when the enemy king is already restricted to a corner or near the border.
Frenzee 151 - Patzer 3.61 [D27]

1.d4 0 1...d5 0 2.c4 0 2...dxc4 0 3.Nf3 0 3...Nf6 0 4.e3 0 4...e6 0 5.Bxc4 0 5...c5 0 6.0-0 0 6...a6 0 7.a4 0 7...Nc6 0 8.Qe2 0 8...cxd4 0 9.Rd1 0 9...Be7 0 10.exd4 0 10...0-0 0 11.Nc3 0 11...Na5 0.62/10 47 12.Ba2 0.44/12 42 12...Bb4 (Te8) 0.89/10 49 13.d5 (Lg5) 0.75/12 41 13...Qe8 (exd5) 0.87/10 48 14.Qc2 (Dd3) 0.87/12 41 14...exd5 1.01/10 46 15.Bg5 1.11/13 41 15...Be7 1.62/11 77 16.Bxf6 1.10/13 41 16...Bxf6 1.75/12 85 17.Nxd5 1.03/12 34 17...Bd8 1.84/12 41 18.Re1 (Sg5) 0.81/12 179 18...Qc6 1.14/11 29 19.Qe4 (Dd2) 0.96/11 35 19...Qg6 (Dh6) 1.12/12 46 20.Qxg6 1.39/13 35 20...hxg6 1.70/13 36 21.Ne7+ 1.44/14 35 21...Bxe7 2.15/15 94 22.Rxe7 1.44/13 12 22...Nc6 2.15/14 5 23.Rc7 (Se5) 1.39/14 37 23...Bg4 (Tb8) 2.04/13 29 24.Ng5 (Sh4) 1.47/13 31 24...Nd8 2.01/12 10 25.f3 (h3) 1.55/14 37 25...Bf5 2.84/15 40 26.a5 1.50/14 37 26...Rb8 2.85/14 31 27.Re1 (Td1) 1.51/13 44 27...b6 2.82/14 29 28.Ree7 (g4) 1.46/13 31 28...bxa5 3.15/15 44 29.g4 (Sxf7) 1.96/13 40 29...Rxb2 (Ld3) 1.57/12 4 30.gxf5 2.69/14 37 30...Rxa2 4.62/14 90 31.fxg6 2.76/14 12 31...Rd2 5.06/13 58 32.gxf7+ 2.90/14 40 32...Nxf7 4.93/15 48 33.Rxf7 2.61/14 40 33...Rxf7 4.75/15 21 34.Nxf7 2.65/14 35 34...a4 4.71/15 20 35.Ng5 2.61/14 30 35...g6 4.78/14 26 36.Rc3 2.68/13 26 36...Kg7 (Tb2) 4.85/13 23 37.Ra3 2.95/14 23 37...Rd5 4.93/15 23 38.f4 (Se4) 3.17/15 20 38...Ra5 5.10/15 21 39.Nf3 3.26/15 18 39...Kf6 5.18/14 19 40.Ne5 (Kf2) 3.35/16 118 40...Kf5 4.98/13 19 41.Nc4 (Kg2) 3.33/16 71 41...Rc5 5.06/15 35 42.Rxa4 3.45/16 67 42...Kxf4 5.06/14 36 43.Nd2+ 3.45/14 63 43...Kf5 5.12/16 40 44.Rxa6 3.49/14 59 44...Rc2 5.15/15 32 45.Ra5+ (Sf3) 3.54/14 56 45...Kg4 5.17/16 70 46.Ra4+ 3.61/14 47 46...Kh3 5.20/17 34 47.Nf3 (Ta3+) 3.57/15 53 47...Rc1+ 5.00/17 32 48.Kf2 3.57/14 15 48...Rc2+ 5.00/16 4 49.Ke3 3.57/14 46 49...g5 5.00/16 49 50.Ra7 3.57/13 43 50...Rc3+ 4.90/16 49 51.Ke4 (Kf2) 3.57/14 40 51...g4 2.23/14 35 52.Rh7+ 3.57/14 38 52...Kg2 2.23/2 0 53.Rg7 3.57/14 36 53...Rc4+ (Kh3) 0.75/12 6 54.Nd4 (Ke3) 3.57/14 34 54...Kxh2 0.82/12 4 55.Rxg4 3.57/13 11 55...Kh3 0.00/1 0 56.Rg7 (Tg5) 0.00/1 0 56...Rc5 0.00/1 0 57.Nf5 (Tf7) 0.00/1 0 57...Rc4+ 0.00/1 0 58.Nd4 (Kd5) 0.00/1 0 58...Rc5 0.00/1 0 59.Nf5 (Tf7) 0.00/1 0 59...Rc4+ 0.00/1 0 60.Nd4 0.00/1 0 ½-½
Terra 3.3B5 - Comet B68 0:1
no position change
Terra started well with a good queen side initiative, 24.c5! and grabbing the open b-file. But this slowly vanished and finally after 37..Bxh3 Comet got the upper hand. Better alternatives for white at first sight seem 35.Re2 Bf5 36.Rxc5 Rxa5 37.Rxa5 Nxc4 38.Rxe8 Nxa5 being the exchange down, but with free pawns (unclear). Instead of 38.Rxe5 maybe better 38.Rdd5 Nf3+ 39.Kh1 Bg4 40.gxf3 Bxf3 41.Kh2 Bxd5 42.Rxd5 Re1 43.Bd3 Ra1 44.Nc4 Ra4 45.Rd7 (looks drawish).
Terra 3.3B5 - Comet B68 [E92]
1.d4 0 1...Nf6 0 2.Nf3 0 2...g6 0 3.c4 0 3...Bg7 0 4.Nc3 0 4...0-0 0 5.e4 0 5...d6 0 6.Be2 0 6...e5 0 7.d5 0 7...a5 0 8.Bg5 0 8...h6 0 9.Bh4 0 9...Na6 0 10.Nd2 0 10...Qe8 0 11.0-0 0 11...Nh7 0 12.a3 0 12...Bd7 0 13.Nb5 0.13/12 99 13...Bf6 (Sg5) 0.24/10 58 14.Bxf6 0.17/14 52 14...Nxf6 0.24/10 12 15.Qb3 (Dc2) 0.14/13 51 15...Qe7 0.13/10 45 16.Qe3 0.17/12 50 16...Kg7 (g5) 0.20/10 41 17.b3 (Tfb1) 0.12/10 50 17...Rh8 (g5) 0.20/9 49 18.Ra2 (Tfb1) 0.14/10 50 18...h5 (Sh7) 0.05/10 57 19.h3 (f3) 0.12/10 52 19...Rhg8 (h4) 0.02/9 53 20.Rfa1 0.19/11 48 20...Rgb8 (Kh7) 0.13/9 45 21.b4 (Sc3) 0.23/11 47 21...Rd8 (Tc8) 0.23/9 54 22.Nc3 (Df3) 0.27/10 50 22...b6 (Df8) 0.47/11 82 23.Rb1 0.49/10 47 23...Nb8 0.51/10 62 24.c5 (Taa1) 0.54/12 56 24...dxc5 0.64/10 32 25.bxc5 0.66/13 35 25...Qxc5 0.59/11 42 26.Qxc5 0.61/14 35 26...bxc5 0.81/11 12 27.Nf3 (Sc4) 0.78/13 35 27...c6 0.71/12 61 28.Nxe5 0.79/13 35 28...cxd5 1.00/12 95 29.exd5 0.81/12 34 29...Bf5 (Lc8) 1.13/11 49 30.Rb5 1.13/13 89 30...Re8 (Se4) 1.05/11 37 31.Nc4 1.03/12 23 31...Nbd7 1.34/11 44 32.Nxa5 (Td2) 1.18/12 23 32...Ne4 1.07/11 33 33.Nxe4 1.09/12 23 33...Bxe4 0.93/12 58 34.Bc4 (d6) 1.18/12 24 34...Ne5 (h4) 1.15/11 26 35.Bf1 (Te2) 0.86/13 24 35...Bxd5 (Sd7) 0.29/12 38 36.Rd2 0.46/13 25 36...Be6 0.24/11 14 37.Rxc5 (Le2) 0.45/12 25 37...Bxh3 (Sd7) 0.33/11 21 38.Rxe5 (Te2) 0.89/12 28 38...Rxe5 -0.38/11 3 39.Nc4 0.65/15 26 39...Rg5 -1.24/12 11 40.f4 0.50/14 21 40...Rg4 (Tg3) -1.28/13 16 41.Rd4 0.26/14 54 41...Ra6 -1.48/13 30 42.Kh2 (Kf2) 0.03/13 40 42...Bxg2 -1.74/13 38 43.Bxg2 (Le2) 0.00/14 39 43...Rf6 -1.74/13 43 44.Rd7 (Se3) -0.30/12 40 44...Rfxf4 -1.96/13 64 45.Ne3 -0.55/13 39 45...Rg5 (Td4) -2.07/12 29 46.Rd3 -0.52/13 38 46...Kh6 (Tf2) -2.19/12 47 47.Kh3 -0.64/11 37 47...h4 -2.47/12 35 48.Nd1 -0.80/14 39 48...Rfg4 -2.61/13 40 49.Bf3 (Lc6) -0.90/14 36 49...Rg3+ (Ta4) -3.03/13 21 50.Kxh4 -0.92/17 36 50...R5g4+ -3.03/13 40 51.Bxg4 0.01/2 0 51...Rxd3 -3.11/14 39 52.Be2 -1.06/17 37 52...Rxa3 -3.12/12 38 53.Kg4 -0.96/15 37 53...f5+ -3.29/12 46 54.Kf4 -1.02/15 36 54...Ra4+ (Ta2) -3.29/12 37 55.Ke3 (Kg3) -1.02/16 36 55...g5 -3.49/10 23 56.Bb5 -1.05/13 35 56...Ra5 (f4+) -3.59/10 36 57.Bc6 -1.09/13 35 57...Kh5 (f4+) -3.62/10 36 58.Nb2 (Sf2) -1.38/13 35 58...Ra3+ -3.75/10 35 59.Kd4 -1.41/14 29 59...g4 -4.02/11 36 60.Nc4 -1.44/13 28 60...Ra2 -3.96/10 33 61.Ne5 (Ke3) -1.60/12 29 61...g3 (f4) -4.13/10 21 62.Nd3 -1.64/14 28 62...Kg4 (Kg5) -4.25/10 24 63.Ne1 -1.65/14 28 63...Rf2 (Ta1) -4.41/10 29 64.Kd3 -3.83/14 40 64...Kh3 -5.90/11 18 65.Kd4 -7.54/14 27 65...f4 -10.60/11 24 66.Nd3 (Ld7+) -9.94/14 57 66...Rd2 -16.68/11 21 67.Bd7+ -9.94/13 48 67...Kh2 -23.87/11 32 0-1
Movei 00_8_163 - Knight Dreamer 3.2 1:0
new positions:
Movei 27
Knight Dreamer 31
Movei 00_8_163 - Knight Dreamer 3.2 [D27]
Movei with active play 13.d5!?. Knight Dreamer with a severe blunder directly after the opening 14...g6?? (instead of 14..h6 for example). The game was already decided with 15.Bg5. Somehow Uri knew (I suppose from his choice) that Knight Dreamer is much weaker with longer time controls.
In fact after a few hundred games in my rating lists Knight Dreamer is 51 Elo >points weaker with longer time controls. There are others where it is the >other way round, like Quark and Comet for example.

I only guessed it based on reading this forum.
I do not test movei against knightdreamer to make comparisons and I have not enough games to be sure.

51 elo when you do not have many hundreds of games at long time control is not significant enough to be sure about it.
I also do not know if you have enough games with Comet and Quark.
I remember the claim about Quark and knightdreamer from will singelton but
I do not remember similiar claim from him about Comet.
Uri

[Heinz van Kempen]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 17 February 2004 10:38:29:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: Nunn C updated, Pyramid games geschrieben von: / posted by: Uri Blass at 17 February 2004 08:29:48:

51 elo when you do not have many hundreds of games at long time control is not significant enough to be sure about it.
I also do not know if you have enough games with Comet and Quark.
I remember the claim about Quark and knightdreamer from will singelton but
I do not remember similiar claim from him about Comet.
Uri

Hello Uri,
For Knight Dreamer 3.2 I have 272 games with 25 minutes and 1179 games on blitz level. Comet I am testing for five years now with so many different versions, (I think most games I ever played where with Comet, followed by Movei) and always happens the same. From Thomas Mayer I got beta versions for Quark, one before the 2.05b release and one now from Paderborn now, what will be tested thoroughly. And when this is not enough I look at other fine sites that often confirm my results. I know I do not have to tell you about the performance of Quark in Leo´s last tournament.
Anyway you are right, one can never be sure and there are people who claim that you do not need hundreds but thousands of games. I only try to come close to a point where I can tell something with +-20 ELO and what seems more important I often look at the games.
Best Regards
Heinz

[Peter Fendrich]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Peter Fendrich at 17 February 2004 12:16:07:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: games for download, new results geschrieben von: / posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 17 February 2004 05:31:46:

Hi Heinz,
Thanks!
When I read my own comment about the Comet game it might look like I meant that Comet is usually waiting and that is the solid style but that wasn't my intention at all. Comet normally has a solid style and in this particular game he just had to wait and then continue with the solid play..
/Peter

Hello Heinz,
Comet just waited and played his normal solid style...
Where did you produce this notation?
I couldn't get it accepted as input by any of my programs!
/Peter

Hello Peter,
yes, seems to be complicated when comments are added. So all Pyramid games so far are now in download section of my homepage and also WildCat 3.0 gauntlet results and games available.



Best Regards
Heinz
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/

>New pyramid results February 17th:
>40 moves in 20 min.
>Quark 2.35 vs. LambChop 10.88       0:1
>Comet B68 vs. Tao 5.4               1:0
>The Baron CCT 6 vs. Ikarus 0.18     1/2
>(got new Baron version only after game was already played)
>DanChess 1.0.4 vs. Gothmog 0.4.6e   0:1
>(hope that Daniel will come up with a rewritten new public version before next cycle)
>