Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1

[Heinz van Kempen]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 21 March 2004 19:44:06:

Hi ,
I started a gauntlet with Gothmog 0.4.7 sel.6. Here are the first 200 games with the usual conditions (Athlon 2600+, 64MB, ponder off, all 20 Nunn openings, 4+5men EGTB, 4m+2s):


Gothmog 0.4.7   - Movei 00_8_178     21.0 - 19.0
Gothmog 0.4.7   - Tao 5.6            20.0 - 20.0
Gothmog 0.4.7   - Amyan 1.593b       18.0 - 22.0
Gothmog 0.4.7   - Anaconda 1.6.2     16.5 - 23.5
Gothmog 0.4.7   - Pepito v1.59       16.0 - 24.0

So very good results overall against opponents with mostly higher ratings, especially against Tao. Games are very entertaining in the typical Gothmog style. For example a win in only 25 moves against Pepito after a knight sac. 

Pepito v1.59 - Gothmog 0.4.7 [C06]
nunn (2.5), 21.03.2004
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 f6 9.exf6 Nxf6 10.0-0 Bd6 11.Nf3 Qc7 12.Nc3 a6 13.Re1  0.03/10  7  0-0  -0.12/11  21  14.Bd2 (De2)  0.00/10  10  14...Ng4 (Ld7)  -1.25/10  7  15.h3 (Le3)  0.11/8  15  15...Bh2+ (Sf6)  -1.59/12  10  16.Kf1  -2.12/12  22  Nxf2  -1.46/12  11  17.Kxf2  -2.12/10  8  Qg3+  -1.62/11  12  18.Kf1  -2.12/9  2  e5  -1.53/11  12  19.Bf4 (Le4)  -2.33/8  13  19...Rxf4  -3.81/10  8  20.Nxd5  -3.21/9  21  Rf8  -5.78/9  11  21.Bc4 (Se7+)  -3.54/8  19  21...Kh8  -7.56/9  7  22.Re3  -5.88/9  16  Bxh3  -8.62/10  6  23.Qe2  -7.16/9  14  exd4  -8.31/10  5  24.Rb3  -6.76/9  5  Na5  -8.84/10  8  25.Qf2  -6.54/10  4  Nxb3 -7.25/10  8  0-1
All games can be downloaded from my site under downloads / gauntlets.
Rating at the moment is 2590 for Gothmog 0.4.7sel6. So 42 points more than Gothmog 0.4.6 so far. Of course much more games for both are needed to be sure. I updated the rating list at my site.
Next opponents in the gauntlet will be Smar Think, Ktulu, AnMon, Slow Chess, PostModernist, Dragon and Patzer with 280 games more.

Tournament D is updated with position 9:
                        1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  
1   Trace 1.27          ** 10 01 1½ 0½ 10 11 11 1½ 10 01 11 10 11  17.5/26
2   Nullmover 0.25      01 ** 11 0½ 00 11 0½ 10 11 01 ½1 ½1 11 11  17.0/26  
3   Chispa v4.041       10 00 ** 10 10 1½ ½½ 11 11 10 11 1½ 11 01  17.0/26  
4   Gnuchess 5.07       0½ 1½ 01 ** 10 1½ 1½ 00 11 1½ 01 ½½ 1½ 11  16.0/26
5   Ufim 4.04           1½ 11 01 01 ** ½0 0½ 10 ½½ 01 01 11 10 01  14.5/26
6   Bestia 0.90         01 00 0½ 0½ ½1 ** 1½ 11 01 11 ½½ ½½ ½0 ½1  14.0/26  
7   Djinn 0.848         00 1½ ½½ 0½ 1½ 0½ ** ½0 01 ½1 0½ 11 11 1½  14.0/26  
8   Hermann 0.9         00 01 00 11 01 00 ½1 ** ½0 ½½ 11 11 10 ½0  12.5/26  
9   Booot 3.1           0½ 00 00 00 ½½ 10 10 ½1 ** ½1 00 11 11 11  12.5/26  
10  Eeyore 1.32         01 10 01 0½ 10 00 ½0 ½½ ½0 ** ½1 00 11 11  12.0/26
11  Waster 0.13a        10 ½0 00 10 10 ½½ 1½ 00 11 ½0 ** ½0 ½1 00  10.5/26
12  Drunken Master 0.9  00 ½0 0½ ½½ 00 ½½ 00 00 00 11 ½1 ** 0½ 11   9.0/26
13  BigLion 2.23i       01 00 00 0½ 01 ½1 00 01 00 00 ½0 1½ ** 01   8.0/26
14  Greko 2.70          00 00 10 00 10 ½0 0½ ½1 00 00 11 00 10 **   7.5/26
Ufim is still leading the overall score.
1 Ufim 4.04            162.0 / 234 
2 Gnuchess 5.07        154.0 / 234 
3 Nullmover 0.25       153.0 / 234 
4 Trace 1.27           141.0 / 234 
5 Chispa v4.041        138.5 / 234 
6 Booot 3.1            131.0 / 234 
7 Djinn 0.848          126.0 / 234 
8 Waster 0.13a         119.5 / 234 
9 Greko 2.70           102.5 / 234 
10 Bestia 0.90          97.0 / 234 
11 Eeyore 1.32          89.5 / 234 
12 Hermann 0.9          79.0 / 234 
13 Drunken Master 0.9   76.0 / 234 
14 BigLion 2.23i        69.0 / 234 
For exact rating calculation from participants here I will add some crossover-games against participants from former tournaments soon.
Tournament Elite will be updated with position 8 tomorrow. 
Top tournament lasts three days with 18 participants for each positions and next one will end on Tuesday morning. I give the interim standings for position 5:
                            1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 
1   AnMon5.30               * 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ½ 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1  15.5/20
2   Amyan 1.593b            1 * ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 1 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 1  13.0/20
3   Pharaon 2.62            0 ½ * ½ 1 1 ½ 0 1 1 1 0 0 ½ 1 1 1 1  12.5/20
4   Slow Chess 2.89b        0 ½ ½ * 1 ½ ½ 1 1 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 1 1 1  12.0/20
5   KnightDreamer 3.2       0 ½ 0 0 * 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 ½ ½ 1  11.5/20  104.50
6   Tao 5.6                 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 * 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1  11.5/20  101.00
7   WildCat 3.0             0 0 ½ ½ 1 1 * ½ 0 0 ½ 1 0 1 ½ 1 1 1  11.0/20
8   Comet B68               0 ½ 1 0 0 0 ½ * 0 1 0 0 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1  10.5/20
9   The Baron 1.3.0b1       0 ½ 0 0 1 0 1 1 * ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 0 ½  10.0/20  100.50
10  Movei 00_8_178          ½ 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ½ * 0 1 ½ 0 1 ½ 1 ½  10.0/20  99.25
11  Little Goliath Nemesis  1 0 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 1 1 1 * ½ ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 1  10.0/20  97.25
12  Ikarus V0.18            0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 ½ 0 ½ * 0 ½ 0 1 ½ ½   9.5/20
13  Fruit 0.98b             0 ½ 1 ½ 0 0 1 ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 * 1 0 0 ½ ½   9.0/20  89.00
14  Gothmog 0.4.6           0 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 1 0 ½ 0 * 1 1 1 1   9.0/20  80.00
15  Sjeng 12.13             0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ ½ 0 0 0 ½ 1 1 0 * 0 1 1   8.0/20
16  Terra 3.3B8             0 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 1 0 1 0 1 * ½ ½   7.0/20
17  Amateur 2.80            1 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 1 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ * 0   5.5/20
18  Quark 2.35              0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 1 *   4.5/20


http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/
Best Regards
Heinz

[Uri Blass]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Uri Blass at 21 March 2004 19:55:56:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1 geschrieben von:/posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 21 March 2004 19:44:06:

Hi ,
I started a gauntlet with Gothmog 0.4.7 sel.6. Here are the first 200 games with the usual conditions (Athlon 2600+, 64MB, ponder off, all 20 Nunn openings, 4+5men EGTB, 4m+2s):


Gothmog 0.4.7   - Movei 00_8_178     21.0 - 19.0
Gothmog 0.4.7   - Tao 5.6            20.0 - 20.0
Gothmog 0.4.7   - Amyan 1.593b       18.0 - 22.0
Gothmog 0.4.7   - Anaconda 1.6.2     16.5 - 23.5
Gothmog 0.4.7   - Pepito v1.59       16.0 - 24.0

So very good results overall against opponents with mostly higher ratings, especially against Tao. Games are very entertaining in the typical Gothmog style. For example a win in only 25 moves against Pepito after a knight sac.

Pepito v1.59 - Gothmog 0.4.7 [C06]
nunn (2.5), 21.03.2004
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 f6 9.exf6 Nxf6 10.0-0 Bd6 11.Nf3 Qc7 12.Nc3 a6 13.Re1  0.03/10  7  0-0  -0.12/11  21  14.Bd2 (De2)  0.00/10  10  14...Ng4 (Ld7)  -1.25/10  7  15.h3 (Le3)  0.11/8  15  15...Bh2+ (Sf6)  -1.59/12  10  16.Kf1  -2.12/12  22  Nxf2  -1.46/12  11  17.Kxf2  -2.12/10  8  Qg3+  -1.62/11  12  18.Kf1  -2.12/9  2  e5  -1.53/11  12  19.Bf4 (Le4)  -2.33/8  13  19...Rxf4  -3.81/10  8  20.Nxd5  -3.21/9  21  Rf8  -5.78/9  11  21.Bc4 (Se7+)  -3.54/8  19  21...Kh8  -7.56/9  7  22.Re3  -5.88/9  16  Bxh3  -8.62/10  6  23.Qe2  -7.16/9  14  exd4  -8.31/10  5  24.Rb3  -6.76/9  5  Na5  -8.84/10  8  25.Qf2  -6.54/10  4  Nxb3 -7.25/10  8  0-1
All games can be downloaded from my site under downloads / gauntlets.
Rating at the moment is 2590 for Gothmog 0.4.7sel6. So 42 points more than Gothmog 0.4.6 so far. Of course much more games for both are needed to be sure.

It is relatively to other results not so good results.
42

[Heinz van Kempen]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 21 March 2004 20:03:02:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1 geschrieben von:/posted by: Uri Blass at 21 March 2004 19:55:56:

All games can be downloaded from my site under downloads / gauntlets.
Rating at the moment is 2590 for Gothmog 0.4.7sel6. So 42 points more than Gothmog 0.4.6 so far. Of course much more games for both are needed to be sure.

It is relatively to other results not so good results.
42I see a suprising bigger improvement in comet when cometB68 is 2594 when
CometB67 only 2502
Uri

Hello Uri,
yes, I know - Tord is even more optimistic. With 280 games more diffence might increase or drop a lot. I am very curious.
For Comet B68 I saw other very good results elsewhere, but I think difference is too high so far compared to B67. That one also started quite good with first positions and then dropped like a stone. Most astonishing for me still Ikarus, although it does not so good with pos. 5 so far. But from almost 1000 games I had with Ikarus before I am sure that it will finally drop to where it belongs.
Best Regards
Heinz

[Kurt Utzinger]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Kurt Utzinger at 21 March 2004 20:21:42:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1 geschrieben von:/posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 21 March 2004 19:44:06:

What's your opinion about Gothmot and EGTB access? See also my message
http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/63780.htm
Kurt

[Uri Blass]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Uri Blass at 21 March 2004 20:50:39:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1 geschrieben von:/posted by: Kurt Utzinger at 21 March 2004 20:21:42:

What's your opinion about Gothmot and EGTB access? See also my message
http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/63780.htm
Kurt

I did not test gothmog but the win is very very deep so you cannot use this position to test table access when it is clear that it is a bad decision to rone the tablebases when the remaining depth is big because the program can often be slowed down without positive effect.

I read that often programs are weaker because they probe the tablebases too often.
The way to test if program is using tablebases is to test if it can find forced mate when the tablebase position is 1 or 2 or 3 moves from the root and not to give it position when the distance from the root is very big.
Uri

[Uri Blass]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Uri Blass at 21 March 2004 20:54:13:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1 geschrieben von:/posted by: Uri Blass at 21 March 2004 20:50:39:

What's your opinion about Gothmot and EGTB access? See also my message
http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/63780.htm
Kurt

I did not test gothmog but the win is very very deep so you cannot use this position to test table access when it is clear that it is a bad decision to rone the tablebases when the remaining depth is big because the program can often be slowed down without positive effect.

I read that often programs are weaker because they probe the tablebases too often.
The way to test if program is using tablebases is to test if it can find forced mate when the tablebase position is 1 or 2 or 3 moves from the root and not to give it position when the distance from the root is very big.
Uri

I can add that tablebases are not needed to see a big score and simply gothmog selective search does not help here
see Junior5's analysis(it is known that Junior5 does not use tablebases).
New game
8/8/K6p/6p1/8/8/k5PP/8 w - - 0 1
Analysis by Junior 5.0:
1.Kb5 Kb3
= (-0.04) Depth: 3 00:00:00
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6
= (-0.01) Depth: 6 00:00:00
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6
= (-0.01) Depth: 6 00:00:00
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6
= (-0.01) Depth: 9 00:00:00
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6
= (-0.01) Depth: 9 00:00:00
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3
= (-0.04) Depth: 12 00:00:00 1kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3
= (-0.04) Depth: 12 00:00:00 2kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3
= (-0.04) Depth: 15 00:00:00 6kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3
= (-0.04) Depth: 15 00:00:00 9kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3 5.Kf6
= (-0.01) Depth: 18 00:00:00 20kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3 5.Kf6
= (-0.01) Depth: 18 00:00:00 26kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3 5.Kf6 Kf2 6.g3 Kf3
= (-0.02) Depth: 21 00:00:00 55kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3 5.Kf6 Kf2 6.g3 Kf3
= (-0.02) Depth: 21 00:00:00 71kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3 5.Kf5 Kf2 6.g3 Kg2 7.h4 gxh4 8.gxh4
= (0.00) Depth: 24 00:00:00 145kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3 5.Kf5 Kf2 6.g3 Kg2 7.h4 gxh4 8.gxh4
= (0.00) Depth: 24 00:00:01 171kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3 5.g4 Kf3 6.Kf5 Kg2 7.Kg6
= (-0.02) Depth: 27 00:00:01 359kN
1.Kb5 Kb3 2.Kc6 Kc4 3.Kd6 Kd3 4.Ke5 Ke3 5.g4 Kf3 6.Kf5 Kg2 7.Kg6
= (-0.02) Depth: 27 00:00:01 411kN
1.Kb5 Kb2 2.Kc6 Kc3 3.Kd6
= (-0.10) Depth: 30 00:00:02 1218kN
1.g4 Kb3 2.Kb5 Kc2
= (-0.02) Depth: 30 00:00:03 1287kN
1.g4 Kb3 2.Kb5 Kc2
= (-0.02) Depth: 30 00:00:03 1332kN
1.g4 Kb3 2.Kb5 Kc2 3.Kc6 Kc3 4.Kc5 Kd3
= (0.25) Depth: 33 00:00:05 2286kN
1.g4 Kb3 2.Kb5 Kc2 3.Kc6 Kc3 4.Kc5 Kd3
= (0.25) Depth: 33 00:00:06 2762kN
1.g4
² (0.55) Depth: 36 00:00:14 8590kN
1.g4
² (0.55) Depth: 36 00:00:15 8807kN
1.g4
± (0.85) Depth: 38 00:00:17 9783kN
1.g4
± (0.85) Depth: 38 00:00:18 10042kN
1.g4
± (1.15) Depth: 40 00:00:21 11257kN
1.g4 Kb3 2.Kb5 Kc2 3.Kc6 Kc3 4.Kc5 Kd3 5.Kd5 Ke3 6.Ke5 Kf3 7.Kf5 Kg2 8.Kg6 Kh3 9.Kh5 Kxh2 10.Kxh6
+- (2.33) Depth: 40 00:00:24 12225kN
1.g4 Kb3 2.Kb5 Kc2 3.Kc6 Kc3 4.Kc5 Kd3 5.Kd5 Ke3 6.Ke5 Kf3 7.Kf5 Kg2 8.Kg6 Kh3 9.Kh5 Kxh2 10.Kxh6
+- (2.33) Depth: 40 00:00:25 12485kN
1.g4 Kb3 2.Kb5 Kc2 3.Kc6 Kc3 4.Kc5 Kd3
+- (2.33) Depth: 42 00:00:29 14309kN
1.g4 Kb3 2.Kb5 Kc2 3.Kc6 Kc3 4.Kc5 Kd3
+- (2.33) Depth: 42 00:00:30 14749kN
1.g4
+- (2.63) Depth: 44 00:00:39 18104kN
1.g4
+- (2.63) Depth: 44 00:00:42 19294kN
1.g4
+- (2.93) Depth: 46 00:00:53 24738kN
1.g4
+- (2.93) Depth: 46 00:00:58 27617kN
1.g4
+- (3.23) Depth: 48 00:01:22 44533kN
(Blass, Tel-Aviv 21.03.2004)

[Heinz van Kempen]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 21 March 2004 20:56:42:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1 geschrieben von:/posted by: Kurt Utzinger at 21 March 2004 20:21:42:

What's your opinion about Gothmot and EGTB access? See also my message
http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/63780.htm
Kurt

From the games I watched, access to 5-men EGTB is no prob for Gothmog. Two examples:

Movei 00_8_178 - Gothmog 0.4.7 [A48]
nunn (2.1), 20.03.2004
1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.Bf4 Bg7 4.e3 d6 5.h3 0-0 6.Be2 c5 7.c3 b6 8.0-0 0.28/8 4 Nc6 (Lb7) 0.10/10 10 9.d5 (c4) 0.23/9 9 9...Na5 -0.06/11 8 10.c4 (Lg5) 0.03/9 5 10...Nh5 -0.15/12 7 11.Qc1 (Dd2) -0.15/10 4 11...Nxf4 -0.53/13 12 12.exf4 -0.21/10 4 e6 -0.40/12 12 13.Nc3 (Td1) -0.30/10 7 13...Ba6 0.00/12 21 14.dxe6 (Te1) -0.41/10 7 14...fxe6 -0.75/11 5 15.Ng5 -0.44/9 6 Qf6 (De7) -0.87/11 9 16.Re1 (De3) -0.40/10 31 16...Nxc4 (h6) -1.00/11 8 17.Bg4 -0.33/10 11 Qxf4 -0.90/12 11 18.Bxe6+ -0.51/9 3 Kh8 -0.28/14 9 19.Qxf4 -0.56/10 10 Rxf4 0.04/13 9 20.Nd5 -0.18/10 6 Rff8 0.04/12 5 21.Nc7 0.43/10 5 Bxb2 0.25/11 6 22.Nxa8 0.89/10 8 Bxa1 0.41/12 8 23.Nc7 0.95/11 5 Bd4 0.35/13 7 24.Re2 0.79/11 7 Ne5 0.44/12 4 25.Nxa6 0.56/11 6 Nd3 0.32/11 4 26.Nf3 0.56/9 2 Nf4 0.47/14 8 27.Nxd4 0.69/12 5 cxd4 0.57/14 7 28.Re4 0.68/12 6 d5 0.57/12 5 29.Re5 0.65/12 14 Re8 (d3) 0.32/12 4 30.Nc7 0.71/13 7 Re7 0.41/13 3 31.g3 0.85/12 5 Nxh3+ 1.13/13 9 32.Kg2 0.97/12 5 Nxf2 0.97/12 3 33.Kxf2 1.10/11 5 Rxc7 1.32/13 5 34.Rxd5 1.28/10 3 Rc2+ 1.32/11 2 35.Kf3 1.41/10 3 Rd2 (Tc3+) 1.57/11 6 36.Rd7 (Kf4) 1.58/9 3 36...a5 1.35/10 2 37.Kf4 (Lc4) 1.78/10 12 37...Re2 1.47/11 3 38.Bb3 1.70/9 3 Rf2+ 1.50/11 3 39.Kg5 1.69/9 2 Rf5+ 1.54/12 6 40.Kg4 (Kh4) 1.56/10 5 40...b5 1.47/11 4 41.Rxd4 1.48/9 2 h5+ (a4) 1.50/12 4 42.Kh3 (Kh4) 1.62/11 13 42...Kg7 1.44/12 4 43.Kg2 (g4) 1.59/8 2 43...Rc5 1.41/11 3 44.Rd7+ 1.67/9 4 Kf6 (Kh6) 1.41/12 5 45.Rd6+ 1.70/10 7 Kg7 1.41/12 3 46.Kf3 1.62/10 6 g5 1.44/11 3 47.Rd7+ 1.62/8 2 Kh6 (Kf6) 1.41/11 3 48.Rb7 (Ke4) 1.68/9 11 48...Rc3+ 1.35/11 4 49.Kf2 1.66/9 2 Rc5 1.35/11 3 50.Ke3 (Tb6+) 1.70/8 2 50...Rc3+ 0.88/11 2 51.Kd2 (Ke4) 1.83/10 2 51...Rxg3 0.57/11 2 52.Rb6+ (Txb5) 1.70/9 3 52...Kg7 0.54/12 2 53.Rxb5 1.78/10 5 a4 (Tg2+) 0.50/11 3 54.Bxa4 1.70/9 2 Rg2+ (h4) 0.50/11 2 55.Ke3 (Kc3) 2.13/10 2 55...Rxa2 0.54/12 3 56.Bd1 1.82/9 2 Kg6 (g4) 0.57/12 3 57.Rb6+ 2.38/10 3 Kf5 0.57/13 2 58.Bxh5 2.38/9 1 Ra3+ 0.57/12 2 59.Kf2 2.40/9 2 Kf4 (Ke5) 0.57/11 1 60.Rf6+ (Tb4+) 2.48/9 6 60...Ke5 0.60/14 2 61.Rf8 (Tf7) 2.51/9 2 61...Rc3 (Ta2+) 0.60/12 1 62.Bg4 2.63/9 4 Ke4 (Kd4) 0.63/13 2 63.Rf7 (Lf3+) 2.70/8 1 63...Ra3 (Tc2+) 0.63/12 2 64.Bd7 (Lf3+) 2.50/8 2 64...Ke5 (Tc3) 0.63/12 2 65.Rf8 (Tf5+) 2.46/8 2 65...Ke4 0.63/12 2 66.Kg2 (Lf5+) 2.58/9 5 66...Rc3 0.63/11 1 67.Bh3 (Lf5+) 2.51/8 2 67...Ra3 0.63/12 2 68.Bf5+ 2.52/9 5 Ke5 0.63/12 2 69.Bg4 2.54/9 3 Ke4 (Ta2+) 0.63/12 1 70.Bh5 (Lf3+) 2.55/8 1 70...Ke5 0.63/12 2 71.Bg6 (Lf3) 2.54/10 7 71...Rc3 (Ke6) 0.63/12 4 72.Bh7 (Tf5+) 2.47/8 1 72...Rc7 (g4) 0.60/11 1 73.Re8+ (Ld3) 2.48/8 1 73...Kf6 0.60/13 3 74.Be4 (Ld3) 2.47/9 3 74...Re7 (Tc3) 0.00/15 2 75.Rxe7 (Tf8+) 2.48/12 3 75...Kxe7 0.00/1 0 76.Kf3 0.00/1 0 g4+ 0.00/1 0 77.Kf4 (Kg3) 0.00/1 0 77...g3 (Kd6) 0.00/1 0 78.Bg2 0.00/1 0 Ke6 0.00/1 0 79.Ke4 0.00/1 0 ½-½

Gothmog 0.4.7 - Movei 00_8_178 [A07]
nunn (1.1), 20.03.2004
1.g3 d5 2.Bg2 Nf6 3.Nf3 c6 4.0-0 Bg4 5.h3 Bh5 6.d3 Nbd7 7.Nbd2 e5 8.e4 h6 -0.08/9 4 9.g4 (c4) 0.00/11 8 9...Bg6 -0.16/11 5 10.exd5 -0.04/12 12 cxd5 0.01/11 11 11.Re1 (De2) 0.59/12 9 11...Qc7 (Le7) -0.15/10 5 12.Nxe5 (De2) 0.59/12 8 12...Nxe5 0.52/10 5 13.f4 0.50/11 18 Bc5+ (Sfd7) 0.52/8 5 14.Kf1 0.75/11 11 Nfd7 0.67/9 7 15.fxe5 0.81/10 6 Qc6 (0-0-0) 0.80/8 5 16.Nb3 (Df3) 1.12/10 5 16...Be7 1.02/8 4 17.Nd4 (Lf4) 1.21/10 6 17...Qb6 1.09/10 12 18.c3 0.93/10 12 Nc5 (0-0-0) 1.17/9 9 19.Nf5 1.31/10 10 Qa6 0.85/9 16 20.Nxg7+ (Ke2) 1.40/10 8 20...Kf8 0.63/11 6 21.Nf5 0.75/12 12 Nxd3 0.65/11 15 22.Re2 0.78/11 5 Bg5 0.40/10 5 23.Bd2 (Lxd5) 0.62/10 5 23...Re8 (Lxf5) 0.23/9 8 24.Bxd5 0.53/10 6 Bxf5 -0.03/9 4 25.gxf5 0.09/10 7 Rxe5 0.30/9 6 26.Rxe5 0.09/10 5 Nxe5+ 0.08/8 9 27.Kg2 0.06/10 6 Qb6 (Db5) 0.03/9 17 28.Kh1 (Lxg5) 0.15/9 4 28...Qxb2 -0.47/9 3 29.Be1 -0.38/11 7 Bf4 -1.07/10 8 30.Bg2 -0.25/11 7 Rg8 -1.05/10 5 31.Qd6+ -0.44/11 4 Kg7 -0.96/10 4 32.Rd1 -0.44/11 3 Qc2 (Kh7) -0.93/9 6 33.Qd5 -0.29/10 7 Nc4 (b6) -0.80/9 20 34.Bf2 (Df3) -0.19/9 3 34...Qxf2 -0.98/9 5 35.Qd4+ -0.50/11 6 Qxd4 -0.89/12 3 36.Rxd4 -0.50/12 3 Nd6 (Kf6) -0.89/10 3 37.Rxf4 -1.10/12 7 Kf6 -1.04/10 3 38.Rd4 -1.04/11 3 Nxf5 -1.32/10 3 39.Rd7 -1.19/11 3 Rg3 -1.50/10 7 40.Rxb7 -1.16/11 3 Ne3 -1.30/10 5 41.Bc6 (Le4) -1.10/11 3 41...Rxh3+ -1.32/9 2 42.Kg1 -1.10/2 0 Nf5 (Sg4) -1.31/9 4 43.Bd7 -0.91/11 3 Nd6 -1.37/11 6 44.Bxh3 -0.97/14 3 Nxb7 -1.41/12 5 45.Kf2 -1.13/16 4 Ke5 -1.46/12 4 46.Bg4 (Lg2) -1.13/15 6 46...Nc5 (Kf4) -1.46/11 2 47.Ke3 -1.13/15 3 a5 (Se4) -1.40/11 2 48.Bh5 (Lf3) -1.07/15 3 48...f5 -1.42/11 2 49.Bf3 -1.10/14 3 Ne6 -1.42/10 1 50.c4 (a3) -1.10/13 2 50...Nc5 -1.51/10 2 51.Bc6 (a3) -1.29/13 5 51...h5 -1.70/12 4 52.Kf3 -1.38/12 3 Ne4 -1.76/11 4 53.Kg2 -1.35/13 3 Kd4 -1.69/10 1 54.Be8 -1.32/13 3 Nc3 (h4) -2.14/12 3 55.a3 -1.44/14 5 Kxc4 -2.24/12 3 56.Bxh5 -1.54/14 4 Kb3 -2.02/12 2 57.Bg6 -1.41/14 2 Kxa3 -1.96/13 4 58.Bxf5 -1.50/14 2 Kb3 (Kb4) 0.00/1 0 59.Be6+ (Kf3) 0.00/1 0 59...Kc2 0.00/1 0 60.Bd7 (Kf3) 0.00/1 0 60...Kd3 0.00/1 0 61.Kf3 0.00/1 0 Kd4 0.00/1 0 62.Kf4 0.00/1 0 Ne4 0.00/1 0 63.Bc6 0.00/1 0 ½-½

[Heinz van Kempen]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 21 March 2004 21:00:15:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1 geschrieben von:/posted by: Kurt Utzinger at 21 March 2004 20:21:42:

What's your opinion about Gothmot and EGTB access? See also my message
http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/63780.htm
Kurt

From your test position with six pieces it seems that Gothmog is not accessing the tablebases at this stage, but I won´t be sure. It is very deep like Uri wrote.

[Kurt Utzinger]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Kurt Utzinger at 21 March 2004 21:35:03:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1 geschrieben von:/posted by: Heinz van Kempen at 21 March 2004 20:56:42:

Without a correct PGN I can only paste moves without other details
in Fritz-GUI. Have therefore no possibilite to check your games
because of missing details like: search depth, score, time and so on.
Kurt

[Tord Romstad]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Tord Romstad at 22 March 2004 10:48:21:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: Nunn tournaments-Gothmog gauntlet part 1 geschrieben von:/posted by: Uri Blass at 21 March 2004 19:55:56:

It is relatively to other results not so good results.
42I see a suprising bigger improvement in comet when cometB68 is 2594 when
CometB67 only 2502

I agree. This is a very impressive improvement.
Tord