Hi Roger,Hello all,
It is coming to the end of the year when the awards are handed out to all sorts of persons who help make this WB community a special place to be.
With that in mind, please gather your thoughts and be prepared to praise, curse or just plain laugh at the standout elements for 2003.
WB engine of the year, WB author of the year, most interesting competition, an open letter of appreciation, a list of rants, a wish list of desired features or releases for 2004, biggest disappointment, an appeal to all the cloners to stop now (I could not help that!) - it is all good.
No Fritz gui rules posts please.
The awards are not returnable, may not be exchanged for cash and are of course, given entirely at the discretion of the giver. No awards committees here!
Later.
I would suggest a new category: best newcomer of the year.WB engine of the year, WB author of the year, most interesting competition, an open letter of appreciation, a list of rants, a wish list of desired features or releases for 2004, biggest disappointment, an appeal to all the cloners to stop now (I could not help that!) - it is all good.
To me there the problem already starts... Well, somehow it is Rebel 12 - at least it has the price for being the longest awaited engine. Then I may say that Crafty should have this place, because it seems it is finally back on the road of success... But also Aristarch gets into my mind. Or Postmodernist - that was also something I was waiting for a long time. And don't forget the development SmarThink has made... And the star: Ruffian - but I want to honour here a free engine, so my choice this year is:WB engine of the year,
WB author of the year
most interesting competition
an open letter of appreciation
a list of rants
a wish list of desired features or releases for 2004
biggest disappointment
No Fritz gui rules posts please.
i would say that this is Kaissa. I'm now playing around with chess programs, for many years, a long time before i have had an own chess prog. I have never seen a progress of more than about 200 to 250 ELO inside one year of an chess prog after the first release. And what i have seen on results for Kaissa 1.7 and 1.8, there must be an improvement between 0.1 and 1.8 of more than 800 ELO, which is absolutely impressiv. My congrats goes to the author of Kaissa.WB engine of the year,
It is hard to select betweenWB engine of the year
Crafty16.19 is not of this year.It is hard to select betweenWB engine of the year
Ktulu,
Chinito,
Kaissa,
SmarThink,
and ... Crafty 16.19
I vote for all five
Igor
I'm agreeCrafty16.19 is not of this year.It is hard to select betweenWB engine of the year
Ktulu,
Chinito,
Kaissa,
SmarThink,
and ... Crafty 16.19
I vote for all five
Igor
Ruffian2 is of this year so it seems Ruffian2 is a better candidate.
Uri
It isn't available to the general public, so I don't even care about it. I include it on the shelf with Ferret and Insomniac as "stong, almost mythical engines that annoy me." I won't go begging the authors for a copy to beta test either. If they don't want to make it available for everyone, I am not terribly interested.i would say that this is Kaissa. I'm now playing around with chess programs, for many years, a long time before i have had an own chess prog. I have never seen a progress of more than about 200 to 250 ELO inside one year of an chess prog after the first release. And what i have seen on results for Kaissa 1.7 and 1.8, there must be an improvement between 0.1 and 1.8 of more than 800 ELO, which is absolutely impressiv. My congrats goes to the author of Kaissa.WB engine of the year,
best wishes
It isn't available to the general public, so I don't even care about it. I include it on the shelf with Ferret and Insomniac as "stong, almost mythical engines that annoy me." I won't go begging the authors for a copy to beta test either. If they don't want to make it available for everyone, I am not terribly interested.
WB engine of the year: surely KtuluHello all,
It is coming to the end of the year when the awards are handed out to all sorts of persons who help make this WB community a special place to be.
With that in mind, please gather your thoughts and be prepared to praise, curse or just plain laugh at the standout elements for 2003.
WB engine of the year, WB author of the year, most interesting competition, an open letter of appreciation, a list of rants, a wish list of desired features or releases for 2004, biggest disappointment, an appeal to all the cloners to stop now (I could not help that!) - it is all good.
No Fritz gui rules posts please.
The awards are not returnable, may not be exchanged for cash and are of course, given entirely at the discretion of the giver. No awards committees here!
Later.
As others have pointed out, Ktulu and Slowchess are also meteoric. (I agree)It isn't available to the general public, so I don't even care about it. I include it on the shelf with Ferret and Insomniac as "stong, almost mythical engines that annoy me." I won't go begging the authors for a copy to beta test either. If they don't want to make it available for everyone, I am not terribly interested.i would say that this is Kaissa. I'm now playing around with chess programs, for many years, a long time before i have had an own chess prog. I have never seen a progress of more than about 200 to 250 ELO inside one year of an chess prog after the first release. And what i have seen on results for Kaissa 1.7 and 1.8, there must be an improvement between 0.1 and 1.8 of more than 800 ELO, which is absolutely impressiv. My congrats goes to the author of Kaissa.WB engine of the year,
best wishes
Smarthink and Sjeng have improved just as much, and they are available.
My "engines of the year" are:
Professional engines:
(tie) Deep Sjeng, Ruffian
Amateur engines:
Smarthink. Perhaps now the strongest free engine (even including Ruffian 1.0.5)
Newcomer:
Dan Chess (and not just because of name similarity)
Pocket Rocket:
Thinker. I am impressed that such a strong engine can come in such a small package.
All of those are nice. Another sweet engine is Aristarch.Hi Roger,
just some personal views - which might change in the last few weeks of the year, who knows...To me there the problem already starts... Well, somehow it is Rebel 12 - at least it has the price for being the longest awaited engine. Then I may say that Crafty should have this place, because it seems it is finally back on the road of success... But also Aristarch gets into my mind. Or Postmodernist - that was also something I was waiting for a long time. And don't forget the development SmarThink has made... And the star: Ruffian - but I want to honour here a free engine, so my choice this year is:WB engine of the year,
WB author of the year
most interesting competition
an open letter of appreciation
a list of rants
a wish list of desired features or releases for 2004
biggest disappointment
No Fritz gui rules posts please.
Abrok ! Why ? I know the author from several discussions and to me the development of Abrok is outstanding.
To me that is easy: Dieter Bürßner. Why ? Nobody else can explain complicate stuff so well in easy words that even I understand it. Dieter is simply great...
well, last year that was nearly no question: WBEC - Ridderkerk. And I still favour it. But there are other interesting competitions that get closer, especially I think about RWBC - the addition of the live viewer will change the competition-world, I am very sure about that.
What we should not forget: There is the long runner George Lyapko with his great tournaments - I don't know of any other public tournament that runs nearly as long as what George is doing. Thanks for that !
I may have forgot here many other great and interesting tourneys - sorry for that, but I must chose some and the mentioned three above are those I watch most.
must be a posting of you somewhere...
No rants in this forum... (When I have understood the word correctly...
Wish list ? No wishes, I have already everything I want... But maybe someone discovers something that I want but do not know yet about it...
For me that was the Deep affair... And I must say that I fear that we will see more such disappointments in the near future... I do not understand those persons... not at all...
Fritz GUI Rulez !But WinBoard has all you need...
You even can use it at computer tourneys... and nobody can complain - it does not claim itself a draw, only the engine can do...
This your right, fortunately your opinion is not the main for me.It isn't available to the general public, so I don't even care about it. I include it on the shelf with Ferret and Insomniac as "stong, almost mythical engines that annoy me." I won't go begging the authors for a copy to beta test either. If they don't want to make it available for everyone, I am not terribly interested.i would say that this is Kaissa. I'm now playing around with chess programs, for many years, a long time before i have had an own chess prog. I have never seen a progress of more than about 200 to 250 ELO inside one year of an chess prog after the first release. And what i have seen on results for Kaissa 1.7 and 1.8, there must be an improvement between 0.1 and 1.8 of more than 800 ELO, which is absolutely impressiv. My congrats goes to the author of Kaissa.WB engine of the year,
best wishes
Smarthink and Sjeng have improved just as much, and they are available.
My "engines of the year" are:
Professional engines:
(tie) Deep Sjeng, Ruffian
Amateur engines:
Smarthink. Perhaps now the strongest free engine (even including Ruffian 1.0.5)
Newcomer:
Dan Chess (and not just because of name similarity)
Pocket Rocket:
Thinker. I am impressed that such a strong engine can come in such a small package.
Gothmog! I forgot about Gothmog. Damn!! I hate it when I forget about Gothmog.As others have pointed out, Ktulu and Slowchess are also meteoric. (I agree)It isn't available to the general public, so I don't even care about it. I include it on the shelf with Ferret and Insomniac as "stong, almost mythical engines that annoy me." I won't go begging the authors for a copy to beta test either. If they don't want to make it available for everyone, I am not terribly interested.i would say that this is Kaissa. I'm now playing around with chess programs, for many years, a long time before i have had an own chess prog. I have never seen a progress of more than about 200 to 250 ELO inside one year of an chess prog after the first release. And what i have seen on results for Kaissa 1.7 and 1.8, there must be an improvement between 0.1 and 1.8 of more than 800 ELO, which is absolutely impressiv. My congrats goes to the author of Kaissa.WB engine of the year,
best wishes
Smarthink and Sjeng have improved just as much, and they are available.
My "engines of the year" are:
Professional engines:
(tie) Deep Sjeng, Ruffian
Amateur engines:
Smarthink. Perhaps now the strongest free engine (even including Ruffian 1.0.5)
Newcomer:
Dan Chess (and not just because of name similarity)
Pocket Rocket:
Thinker. I am impressed that such a strong engine can come in such a small package.
I do not mean to demean your effort. Certainly you have great talent. But the private engines like Ferret and Kaissa are little more than a small frustration for me.This your right, fortunately your opinion is not the main for me.It isn't available to the general public, so I don't even care about it. I include it on the shelf with Ferret and Insomniac as "stong, almost mythical engines that annoy me." I won't go begging the authors for a copy to beta test either. If they don't want to make it available for everyone, I am not terribly interested.i would say that this is Kaissa. I'm now playing around with chess programs, for many years, a long time before i have had an own chess prog. I have never seen a progress of more than about 200 to 250 ELO inside one year of an chess prog after the first release. And what i have seen on results for Kaissa 1.7 and 1.8, there must be an improvement between 0.1 and 1.8 of more than 800 ELO, which is absolutely impressiv. My congrats goes to the author of Kaissa.WB engine of the year,
best wishes
I have understood you, thanks.I do not mean to demean your effort. Certainly you have great talent. But the private engines like Ferret and Kaissa are little more than a small frustration for me.This your right, fortunately your opinion is not the main for me.It isn't available to the general public, so I don't even care about it. I include it on the shelf with Ferret and Insomniac as "stong, almost mythical engines that annoy me." I won't go begging the authors for a copy to beta test either. If they don't want to make it available for everyone, I am not terribly interested.i would say that this is Kaissa. I'm now playing around with chess programs, for many years, a long time before i have had an own chess prog. I have never seen a progress of more than about 200 to 250 ELO inside one year of an chess prog after the first release. And what i have seen on results for Kaissa 1.7 and 1.8, there must be an improvement between 0.1 and 1.8 of more than 800 ELO, which is absolutely impressiv. My congrats goes to the author of Kaissa.WB engine of the year,
best wishes
SmarThink!!! Aristarch, Delfi and Kaissa are also deserved a good words.WB engine of the year:
Return to Archive (Old Parsimony Forum)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests