Tao 5.6 vs Anaconda 1.6.2 (1) 40'/40 (commented game)

Archive of the old Parsimony forum. Some messages couldn't be restored. Limitations: Search for authors does not work, Parsimony specific formats do not work, threaded view does not work properly. Posting is disabled.

Tao 5.6 vs Anaconda 1.6.2 (1) 40'/40 (commented game)

Postby Kurt Utzinger » 15 Mar 2004, 22:50

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Kurt Utzinger at 15 March 2004 22:50:24:

[Event "Anac162_Tao56 P3 800/64 40'/40"]
[Site "Wetzikon"]
[Date "2004.03.13"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Anaconda 1.6.2"]
[Black "Tao 5.6"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "D32"]
[Annotator "Utzinger,K"]
[PlyCount "58"]
{W=11.3 ply; 101kN/s
B=12.3 ply; 180kN/s
} 1. c4 {Fritz8-GUI, P3 800/64 MB
hash, ponder=off, Tao 5.6 own book, Anaconda 1.6.2 with general.ctg, 3-/4-men
EGTB, no book learning, time control 40'/40+40'/40+40' 0} 1... e6 {0.01/0 0} 2.
d4 {0} 2... d5 {0.01/0 0} 3. Nc3 {0} 3... c5 {0.01/0 0} 4. cxd5 {0} 4... exd5 {
0.01/0 0} 5. Nf3 {0} 5... Nf6 {Black last book move 0.01/0 0} 6. Bg5 {0} 6...
Be7 {0.22/12 132} 7. e3 {White last book move 0} 7... c4 {0.21/11 64} (7... O-O
8. dxc5 Be6 9. Bd3 Bxc5 10. Rc1 Nc6 11. O-O Be7 12. Bb1 Rc8 13. a3 Qa5 14. Qd3
g6 15. Ba2 Ne4 {shredder8.ctg}) 8. Rc1 {(Be2) 0.39/11 290} 8... O-O {
(Be6) 0.01/11 67} 9. Be2 {0.33/11 179} 9... Bf5 {(Be6) 0.12/11 64} 10. Bxf6 {
(0-0) 0.47/10 34} 10... Bxf6 {0.27/13 64} 11. Nd2 {(b3) 0.27/10 36} 11... Qd7 {
-0.08/11 64} 12. Bf3 {(b3) 0.35/11 86} 12... Be6 {-0.29/12 64} 13. b3 {
0.22/11 68} 13... Na6 {(cxb3) -0.21/12 64} 14. bxc4 {0.73/10 60} 14... dxc4 {
-0.08/12 64} 15. Nce4 {(d5) 0.71/10 67} 15... Be7 {-0.15/11 64} 16. Nxc4 {
0.75/10 67} 16... Rac8 {-0.21/10 89} 17. Ned2 {(d5) 0.41/10 84} (17. d5 Bxd5
18. Nc3 Rxc4 19. Nxd5 {was the best way for White to keep the balance}) 17...
Nb4 {-0.53/11 66} 18. Ne5 {(0-0) A wrong decision as White will be forced to
keep its king in the centre. And therefore, 18.0-0 was the only move although
Black has anyway the better position -0.11/11 79} 18... Rxc1 {-0.64/12 64} 19.
Qxc1 {-0.36/12 245} 19... Rc8 {(Qb5) -0.75/12 63} 20. Qb1 {(Qd1) -0.19/10 97}
20... Qb5 {(Qe8) Has Anaconda 1.6.2 overlooked this move -0.73/10 71} 21. a4 {
-0.59/10 92} 21... Qa6 {-0.81/11 75} 22. Be4 {(Be2) -0.52/10 48} (22. Be2 Qxa4
23. O-O {was the last chance for Anaconda to secure its king}) 22... Ba2 {
(f5) -1.24/10 63} 23. Qd1 {-0.46/11 94} 23... f6 {-1.82/11 62} 24. Nef3 {
(Nd7) -0.62/10 42} 24... Nd3+ {
with already a won position for Black -4.21/13 63} 25. Bxd3 {-5.17/12 195}
25... Qxd3 {-5.52/13 62} 26. h4 {(a5) -6.04/11 115} (26. Qe2 Rc1+ 27. Qd1 Bc4
28. Ng1 Bb4 29. f4 Qxd2#) 26... Bb4 {-7.65/13 63} 27. h5 {(a5) -14.37/13 150}
27... Bb3 {-8.97/13 313} 28. Qxb3+ {-9.70/12 25} 28... Qxb3 {-8.95/14 45} 29.
O-O {-9.75/12 18} 29... Qc2 {(Qxa4) Anaconda 1.6.2 was too materialistic and
lost the right of castling. This allowed Tao 5.6 an easy win -9.12/14 45} 0-1
Kurt Utzinger
 

Return to Archive (Old Parsimony Forum)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests