WOCT2 final team Finland completed

[Ciro Vignotto]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 28 January 2004 21:53:01:

1: Requiem v0.53 2210 5.5 / 6
2: Hoplite 1.4.1 3.5 / 6
3: Ozwald 0.43 1930 2.0 / 6
4: Nero 5.3 1867 1.0 / 6
Greetings, Ciro


http://vigo.altervista.org

[Ciro Vignotto]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 29 January 2004 07:38:51:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: WOCT2 final team Finland completed geschrieben von: / posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 28 January 2004 21:53:01:

[Ciro Vignotto]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 30 January 2004 12:56:55:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: The final of the team Australia currently running IP 80.117.108.102, port 16000 (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 29 January 2004 07:38:51:

[Ciro Vignotto]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 30 January 2004 12:56:59:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: The final of the team Australia currently running IP 80.117.108.102, port 16000 (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 29 January 2004 07:38:51:

[Thomas McBurney]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Thomas McBurney at 30 January 2004 14:17:56:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Now @ IP 80.182.17.62, port 16000 (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 30 January 2004 12:56:59:

Hi Ciro,
In the game below I'm mystified as to why Kanguruh lost the game on time. Kanguruh was clearly winning the game before it lost on time. I haven't seen Kanguruh loose a game on time in many months. It maybe a bug, but I cannot see anything about the game that could trigger a bug, I have replayed the game here and Kanguruh had no issues with the moves. Do you still have the debug file for this game?

{game n.18 Rnd 6 [121 vs 127] AUS vs AUS}
[Event "Computer chess game"]
[Site "CIRO-NEW"]
[Date "2004.01.30"]
[Round "6.1"]
[White "Kanguruh v1.712"]
[Black "KnightCap_33"]
[Result "0-1"]
[TimeControl "1800+10"]
1. d4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. g3 c5 4. Bg2 Nc6 5. O-O Qb6 6. dxc5 Bxc5 7. Nc3 Qa6
8. e4 d4 9. Ne2 e5 10. Bg5 h6 11. Bd2 Bg4 12. c3 d3 13. Nc1 O-O-O 14. b4
Be7 15. a4 b5 16. c4 bxc4 17. b5 Qb6 18. bxc6 Bf6 19. Be3 Qc7 20. Rb1 Rd6
21. Rb7 Qxc6 22. Rxf7 Ne7 23. Nxe5 Bxd1 24. Nxc6 Nxc6 25. Rxd1 Re8 26. Bf4
Ne5 27. Rxa7 g5 28. Bxe5 Bxe5 29. Ra8+ Kd7 30. Bh3+ Ke7 31. Rxe8+ Kxe8 32.
Bf1 Ke7 33. Nxd3 cxd3 34. Bxd3 Kf6 35. h4 Rd4 36. hxg5+ hxg5 37. a5 Bc7 38.
a6 Ke5 39. Bc2 Rxd1+ 40. Bxd1 Bb6 41. Bc2 Ba7 42. Kg2 Bd4 43. f3 Ba7 44.
Kh3 Be3 45. Kg4 Kd6 46. Kf5 Kc6 47. Bb3 Kb5 48. e5 Kxa6 49. e6 Bc5 50. Kxg5
Kb6 51. Kf6 Kb5 52. e7 Kb4 53. e8=Q Bd4+ 54. Kg5 Kxb3 55. f4 Bc3 56. f5
Bd2+ 57. Kh5 Bc3 58. f6 Bb4 59. f7 Kc3
{Black wins on time} 0-1

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Günther Simon at 30 January 2004 14:29:36:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: Now @ IP 80.182.17.62, port 16000 (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Thomas McBurney at 30 January 2004 14:17:56:

Hi Ciro,
In the game below I'm mystified as to why Kanguruh lost the game on time. Kanguruh was clearly winning the game before it lost on time. I haven't seen Kanguruh loose a game on time in many months. It maybe a bug, but I cannot see anything about the game that could trigger a bug, I have replayed the game here and Kanguruh had no issues with the moves. Do you still have the debug file for this game?

{game n.18 Rnd 6 [121 vs 127] AUS vs AUS}
[Event "Computer chess game"]
[Site "CIRO-NEW"]
[Date "2004.01.30"]
[Round "6.1"]
[White "Kanguruh v1.712"]
[Black "KnightCap_33"]
[Result "0-1"]
[TimeControl "1800+10"]
1. d4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. g3 c5 4. Bg2 Nc6 5. O-O Qb6 6. dxc5 Bxc5 7. Nc3 Qa6
8. e4 d4 9. Ne2 e5 10. Bg5 h6 11. Bd2 Bg4 12. c3 d3 13. Nc1 O-O-O 14. b4
Be7 15. a4 b5 16. c4 bxc4 17. b5 Qb6 18. bxc6 Bf6 19. Be3 Qc7 20. Rb1 Rd6
21. Rb7 Qxc6 22. Rxf7 Ne7 23. Nxe5 Bxd1 24. Nxc6 Nxc6 25. Rxd1 Re8 26. Bf4
Ne5 27. Rxa7 g5 28. Bxe5 Bxe5 29. Ra8+ Kd7 30. Bh3+ Ke7 31. Rxe8+ Kxe8 32.
Bf1 Ke7 33. Nxd3 cxd3 34. Bxd3 Kf6 35. h4 Rd4 36. hxg5+ hxg5 37. a5 Bc7 38.
a6 Ke5 39. Bc2 Rxd1+ 40. Bxd1 Bb6 41. Bc2 Ba7 42. Kg2 Bd4 43. f3 Ba7 44.
Kh3 Be3 45. Kg4 Kd6 46. Kf5 Kc6 47. Bb3 Kb5 48. e5 Kxa6 49. e6 Bc5 50. Kxg5
Kb6 51. Kf6 Kb5 52. e7 Kb4 53. e8=Q Bd4+ 54. Kg5 Kxb3 55. f4 Bc3 56. f5
Bd2+ 57. Kh5 Bc3 58. f6 Bb4 59. f7 Kc3
{Black wins on time} 0-1

Hi Tommy, what if Kanguruh underpromoted in the next move and
Knightcap declined that move as illegal?
(Right now I dont remember if Knightcap has an underpromotion bug...)
Should be easy to verify anyway.
Best wishes,
Günther

[Thomas McBurney]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Thomas McBurney at 30 January 2004 14:52:59:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: Now @ IP 80.182.17.62, port 16000 (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Günther Simon at 30 January 2004 14:29:36:

Hi Tommy, what if Kanguruh underpromoted in the next move and
Knightcap declined that move as illegal?
(Right now I dont remember if Knightcap has an underpromotion bug...)
Should be easy to verify anyway.
Best wishes,
Günther

G'day Gunther,
I'm not sure what happened, but if Knightcap thought it was an illegal move then wouldn't Kinightcap have lost on time? I'm now working on the theory that it maybe a bug relating to fisher time control, since I don't test a lot in this mode. I also noticed that Bodo lost on time too, not sure if this is unusual for Bodo but I think I will check out the other games to see if there are lots of games lost on time.
Cheers,
Tom.

[Ciro Vignotto]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 30 January 2004 18:54:30:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: Now @ IP 80.182.17.62, port 16000 (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Thomas McBurney at 30 January 2004 14:17:56:

[Thomas McBurney]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Thomas McBurney at 31 January 2004 05:13:59:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: sent (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Ciro Vignotto at 30 January 2004 18:54:30:

Hi Ciro,
Thanks, I found the reason for the loss on time. Kanguruh has a stupid stupid stupid bug when it calculated the time to spend on the move, I cannot believe I made this mistake. As can be seen below from the debug file, Kanguruh receives from winboard that there is 47 seconds left on the clock, then Kanguruh acknowledgeds this by saying "Time left on clock= 42.38", note there is 5 second saftey zone added to the time left. After that it then calculated that the time it should spend on this move is 53 seconds which is 10 seconds more than what it thinks is time left on the clock. Kanguruh added the 10 second Fischer time control increment to the time left on clock and thats how it got it wrong.

4719672 >first : time 4738
otim 2421
4719672 >first : b3c3
4719750