WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t)

Archive of the old Parsimony forum. Some messages couldn't be restored. Limitations: Search for authors does not work, Parsimony specific formats do not work, threaded view does not work properly. Posting is disabled.

WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t)

Postby Leo Dijksman » 23 Jan 2004, 23:03

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Leo Dijksman at 23 January 2004 23:03:18:




WBEC Ridderkerk homepage.
Leo Dijksman
 

Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t)

Postby Dann Corbit » 24 Jan 2004, 00:47

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Dann Corbit at 24 January 2004 00:47:24:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Leo Dijksman at 23 January 2004 23:03:18:


1 1 DeepSjeng 1.5 * 2674 33 236 Premier Premier
2 130 The King 3.23 2636 New 68 Premier Premier
3 -2 Ruffian 2.0.0 2631 -11 304 Premier Premier
4 -1 Gandalf 4.32h * 2590 -22 340 Premier Premier
5 -1 Aristarch 4.21 2582 -3 382 Premier Premier
6 -1 Little Goliath 3.9 po 2567 -11 380 Premier Premier
7 126 Rebel 12 2567 New 68 Premier Premier
8 1 SmarThink 0.17a 2563 45 515 Premier Premier
9 -2 WARP 0.58 ** 2555 -7 252 Premier Premier
10 1 GreenLightChess 3.00 2554 53 464 Premier Premier
11 -3 WBNimzo2000b * 2538 -6 340 None Premier
12 -6 Crafty 19.06 2536 -38 416 Premier Premier
13 3 Zarkov 4.5e ** 2518 44 340 Premier Premier

I think The King 3.23, Ruffian 2.0.0, Rebel 12 should all have an asterisk by their name, because they are professional (cost money) programs.
Or is there another definition?



my ftp site {remove http:// unless you like error messages}
Dann Corbit
 

Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t)

Postby Robert Allgeuer » 24 Jan 2004, 09:12

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Robert Allgeuer at 24 January 2004 09:12:26:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Leo Dijksman at 23 January 2004 23:03:18:

What is the reason for Anmon 5.22 being excluded?
Thanks
Robert
Robert Allgeuer
 

Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t)

Postby Tim Foden » 24 Jan 2004, 10:00

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Tim Foden at 24 January 2004 10:00:30:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Robert Allgeuer at 24 January 2004 09:12:26:
What is the reason for Anmon 5.22 being excluded?
Thanks
Robert
It appears at position 26... :)
24 -4 Delfi 4.3 2443 -13 390 1st 1st
25 6 Amyan 1.59 2438 56 380 ? 1st
26 0 AnMon 5.22 2432 16 380 None 1st
27 -12 Pepito 1.59 2430 -44 432 1st 1st
28 23 Kaissa 1.7 2428 188 206 1st 3rd
Cheers, Tim.
Tim Foden
 

Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t)

Postby Leo Dijksman » 24 Jan 2004, 10:24

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Leo Dijksman at 24 January 2004 10:24:19:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Dann Corbit at 24 January 2004 00:47:24:
1 1 DeepSjeng 1.5 * 2674 33 236 Premier Premier
2 130 The King 3.23 2636 New 68 Premier Premier
3 -2 Ruffian 2.0.0 2631 -11 304 Premier Premier
4 -1 Gandalf 4.32h * 2590 -22 340 Premier Premier
5 -1 Aristarch 4.21 2582 -3 382 Premier Premier
6 -1 Little Goliath 3.9 po 2567 -11 380 Premier Premier
7 126 Rebel 12 2567 New 68 Premier Premier
8 1 SmarThink 0.17a 2563 45 515 Premier Premier
9 -2 WARP 0.58 ** 2555 -7 252 Premier Premier
10 1 GreenLightChess 3.00 2554 53 464 Premier Premier
11 -3 WBNimzo2000b * 2538 -6 340 None Premier
12 -6 Crafty 19.06 2536 -38 416 Premier Premier
13 3 Zarkov 4.5e ** 2518 44 340 Premier Premier

I think The King 3.23, Ruffian 2.0.0, Rebel 12 should all have an asterisk by their name, because they are professional (cost money) programs.
Or is there another definition?
You are right Dann, Thanks!
Leo.


WBEC Ridderkerk homepage.
Leo Dijksman
 

Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t)

Postby Robert Allgeuer » 24 Jan 2004, 12:51

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Robert Allgeuer at 24 January 2004 12:51:25:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Tim Foden at 24 January 2004 10:00:30:
What is the reason for Anmon 5.22 being excluded?
Thanks
Robert
It appears at position 26... :)
24 -4 Delfi 4.3 2443 -13 390 1st 1st
25 6 Amyan 1.59 2438 56 380 ? 1st
26 0 AnMon 5.22 2432 16 380 None 1st
27 -12 Pepito 1.59 2430 -44 432 1st 1st
28 23 Kaissa 1.7 2428 188 206 1st 3rd
Cheers, Tim.
I mean in future tournaments (it says "none") in the second last column.
Robert
Robert Allgeuer
 

Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t)

Postby Leo Dijksman » 24 Jan 2004, 13:09

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Leo Dijksman at 24 January 2004 13:09:22:
Als Antwort auf: / In reply to: Re: WBEC Ridderkerk ratinglist updated! (n/t) geschrieben von: / posted by: Robert Allgeuer at 24 January 2004 12:51:25:
What is the reason for Anmon 5.22 being excluded?
Thanks
Robert
It appears at position 26... :)
24 -4 Delfi 4.3 2443 -13 390 1st 1st
25 6 Amyan 1.59 2438 56 380 ? 1st
26 0 AnMon 5.22 2432 16 380 None 1st
27 -12 Pepito 1.59 2430 -44 432 1st 1st
28 23 Kaissa 1.7 2428 188 206 1st 3rd
Cheers, Tim.
I mean in future tournaments (it says "none") in the second last column.
Robert
Hi Robert,
Its removed because it lose games on time and the author is not going to fix it!!
Leo.


WBEC Ridderkerk homepage.
Leo Dijksman
 


Return to Archive (Old Parsimony Forum)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests