RWBC new results

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Günther Simon at 10 July 2004 13:48:14:

After 9 rounds Fruit and Snitch have acchieved a comfortable lead.
Djinn and Trace are surprisingly well placed currently.
I am sorry to announce that I have to remove Plywood from RWBC,
as it doesn't accomplish anymore the newer rigorous rules.
(of course it can return next edition, if there is a bugfixed
newer version)
Günther
RWBC Class C 4th Edition - Round 9
169. #9 Fruit_15JR - Trace_129 [ 60] 1-0 B52 (q5:b2) |
170. #9 Snitch_0366 - Scidlet_36 [ 91] 1-0 C78 (rb3:rb1) |
171. #9 Djinn_0870 - Zappa_070X [ 48] 1-0 C89 (b5:b1) |
172. #9 Nullmover_025 - Hagrid_0756 [ 42] 0-1 B81 (r2:q5) |
173. #9 Jonny_262 - Greko_281 [ 57] =-= D51 (2:b) |
174. #9 Holmes_0829e - Booot_403 [ 77] 0-1 D02 (1:q2) |
175. #9 Alarm_0931 - DanChess_106e [ 63] 0-1 B31 (4:qrb1) |
176. #9 Genesis_201b01 - GnuChess_40TM [ 93] 0-1 A81 (1:B) |
177. #9 Fortress_162 - Monarch2002_04c [100] =-= A52 (r2:r) |
178. #9 Dorky_348 - Ax_08 [ 66] 1-0 B27 (qb2:3) |
179. #9 BigLion_223i - EnginMax_511c [124] =-= E32 (b:r) |
180. #9 OliThink_411 - Madeleine_02 [ 75] 1-0 C43 (q3:rn) |
181. #9 Faile_14DC - Sunsetter_C10 [117] 0-1 B13 (:r) |
182. #9 Ghost_013 - Chispa_4032 [ 50] 1-0 B52 (Rn6:rn4) |
183. #9 LadyGambit_10 - Asterisk_04b [ 77] 1-0 B12 (r:) |
184. #9 LaDameBlanche_20c - Freyr_1067 [ 49] 1-0 C10 (qrb3:1) |
185. #9 MrChess_21 - ThorsHammer_20 [ 36] 1-0 B78 (qrb4:5) |
186. #9 Armageddon2_247 - DrChess_204b [ 74] 1-0 A17 (r:) |
187. #9 RDChess_323 - SmallPotato_061 [ 58] 0-1 B22 (1:R2) |
188. #9 Matheus_23 - Gully_215pl10 [ 58] 0-1 C41 (n:q3) |
189. #9 Plywood_173 - Taktix_223i [ 77] =-= B25 (r:b) |*F wrong 50 moves claim by Plywood (but not enough material for Black)

RWBC Class C 4thEdition - Round 10
1 DanChess_106e, ET [6] : Fruit_15JR, FR [8]
2 Trace_129, AU [6] : Snitch_0366, DE [7.5]
3 Booot_403, UA [6] : Djinn_0870, US [6.5]
4 Hagrid_0756, DE [6] : Zappa_070X, UK [6]
5 Scidlet_36, US [5.5] : GnuChess_40TM, US [5.5]
6 Dorky_348, US [5] : Jonny_262, DE [5.5]
7 GreKo_281, RU [5.5] : Holmes_0829e, DE [5]
8 Nullmover_025, NL [5] : OliThink_411, DE [5]
9 Fortress_162, CH-I [4.5] : Alarm_0931, SE [4.5]
10 Sunsetter_C10, DE [4.5] : Ghost_013, DE [4.5]
11 Monarch2002_04c, UK [4.5] : LadyGambit_10, IT [4.5]
12 EnginMax_511c, DE [4.5] : Genesis_201b1, IL [4.5]
13 LaDameBlanche_20c, CH [4] : BigLion_223i, CM-D [4.5]
14 Ax_08, VI [4] : MrChess_21, SG [4]
15 Madeleine_02, IT [4] : Faile_14DC, CA [4]
16 DrChess_204b, SG [3] : Gully_215pl10, DE [3.5]
17 Freyr_1067, RO [3] : Armageddon2_247, PL [3.5]
18 SmallPotato_061, AU [3.5] : Plywood_173, US [2.5]
19 Chispa_4032, AR [3.5] : RDChess_323, AT [2.5]
20 Asterisk_04b, HU [3] : Matheus_23, BR [2]
21 ThorsHammer_20, CR-I [3] : Taktix_223i, CM-D [1.5]
Standings
Place Name Feder Author Score M-Buch. Buch. Progr.
1 Fruit_15JR, FR Fabien Letouzey 8.0 46.0 57.5 45.0
2 Snitch_0366, DE Klaus Friedel 7.5 43.0 54.5 47.0
3 Djinn_0870, US Tom Likens 6.5 44.5 56.0 38.5
4 Zappa_070X, UK Anthony Cozzie 6.0 46.5 58.5 39.0
5 Trace_129, AU Ross Boyd 6.0 42.5 52.5 37.0
6 Hagrid_0756, DE Klaus Friedel 6.0 40.0 52.0 34.0
7 Booot_403, UA Alex Morozov 6.0 39.5 49.0 34.0
8 DanChess_106e, ET Daniel Shawul 6.0 38.5 49.5 36.5
9 Scidlet_36, US Shane Hudson 5.5 43.5 55.5 34.0
10 Jonny_262, DE Johannes Zwanzger 5.5 43.0 52.5 34.0
11 GreKo_281, RU Vladimir Medvedev 5.5 38.5 49.0 31.0
12 GnuChess_40TM, US John Stanback 5.5 35.5 44.0 26.5
13 Holmes_0829e, DE Andreas Herrmann 5.0 45.5 57.5 37.5
14 Nullmover_025, NL Michael Langeveld 5.0 40.0 49.0 28.0
15 Dorky_348, US Matt McKnight 5.0 37.5 46.5 30.5
16 OliThink_411, DE Oliver Brausch 5.0 30.5 39.0 24.0
17 BigLion_223i, CM-D Matthias Gemuh 4.5 40.5 49.5 29.0
18 Alarm_0931, SE B.Antonsson + E.Robertsson 4.5 39.5 51.0 30.5
19 Fortress_162, CH-I Alessandro Damiani 4.5 38.0 47.5 30.0
20 Monarch2002_04c, UK Steve Maughan 4.5 37.0 46.0 25.0
21 Genesis_201b1, IL Omid David 4.5 36.5 45.5 29.5
22 LadyGambit_10, IT Carlo Pivotto 4.5 35.5 44.5 26.0
23 EnginMax_511c, DE Engin Uestuen 4.5 35.5 43.5 29.0
24 Ghost_013, DE Philipp Classen 4.5 33.0 41.5 25.0
25 Sunsetter_C10, DE Georg v. Zimmermann 4.5 32.5 41.0 22.5
26 Faile_14DC, CA Adrien Regimbald 4.0 41.0 52.5 32.5
27 Ax_08, VI Pham Hong Nguyen 4.0 35.5 44.0 24.5
28 LaDameBlanche_20c, CH Marc-Phillipe Huget 4.0 33.5 41.5 24.0
29 Madeleine_02, IT Luigi Ripamonti 4.0 33.5 41.0 25.0
30 MrChess_21, SG Aloysius Han 4.0 24.5 32.0 16.5
31 Armageddon2_247, PL Grzegorz Sidorowicz 3.5 34.0 43.0 24.5
32 Chispa_4032, AR Federico Corigliano 3.5 31.5 38.5 24.5
33 Gully_215pl10, DE Martin Borriss 3.5 31.5 38.5 20.5
34 SmallPotato_061, AU Alejandro Dubovski 3.5 29.5 37.5 19.0
35 Asterisk_04b, HU Horvath Peter 3.0 33.5 41.0 18.5
36 Freyr_1067, RO Andrej Fortuna 3.0 32.5 39.5 18.5
37 ThorsHammer_20, CR-I Toma Roncevicz 3.0 31.0 38.5 18.0
38 DrChess_204b, SG Aloysius Han 3.0 23.5 31.0 16.0
39 RDChess_323, AT Rudolf Posch 2.5 32.0 39.0 16.5
40 Plywood_173, US Jim Bumgardner 2.5 28.0 34.5 13.0 3x (will be removed!)
41 Matheus_23, BR Josue Forte 2.0 25.5 33.0 11.5
42 Taktix_223i, CM-D Matthias Gemuh 1.5 26.0 32.5 8.0

[Alejandro Dubrovsky]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Alejandro Dubrovsky at 10 July 2004 14:37:27:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: RWBC new results geschrieben von:/posted by: Günther Simon at 10 July 2004 13:48:14:

Games not up for this round yet?



SmallPotato homepage

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Günther Simon at 10 July 2004 14:43:23:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: RWBC new results geschrieben von:/posted by: Alejandro Dubrovsky at 10 July 2004 14:37:27:

Games not up for this round yet?

Hi Alejandro,
Perhaps my provider was a bit slow? At least when I open the file
from my site now, all games from round 9 are in.
Regards,
Günther

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Günther Simon at 10 July 2004 14:51:35:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: RWBC new results geschrieben von:/posted by: Günther Simon at 10 July 2004 13:48:14:

4b1k1/1r4b1/p2ppqp1/8/1r2PP1R/2NB4/1PP4Q/2K3R1 w - - 0 32
Very sharp and interesting game between DanChess and Fruit!

[Alejandro Dubrovsky]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Alejandro Dubrovsky at 10 July 2004 14:55:27:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: RWBC new results geschrieben von:/posted by: Günther Simon at 10 July 2004 14:43:23:

Games not up for this round yet?

Hi Alejandro,
Perhaps my provider was a bit slow? At least when I open the file
from my site now, all games from round 9 are in.
Regards,
Günther

Maybe just too impatient. Thanks.
(search bug in RDChess or a strange evaluation function? Move 19 blunders a knight)



SmallPotato homepage

[Günther Simon]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Günther Simon at 10 July 2004 15:06:17:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: Re: RWBC new results (bug in RDChess?) geschrieben von:/posted by: Alejandro Dubrovsky at 10 July 2004 14:55:27:

Games not up for this round yet?

Hi Alejandro,
Perhaps my provider was a bit slow? At least when I open the file
from my site now, all games from round 9 are in.
Regards,
Günther

Maybe just too impatient. Thanks.
(search bug in RDChess or a strange evaluation function? Move 19 blunders a knight)

Thanks for the hint Alejandro! It's a pity but I am too busy with
work currently, therefore I cant check the games for more than
wrong result claims, time losses and such things.
Here is the debug part for the blunder:
I dont see a reason for changing from Qd1 to Rd1 as there was no fail low,
(at least no printed one)instead all PVs before had the same eval?
544483 >first : d3c1
544673 <first : 5 -33 0 497 Rxc1 Qd2 
544673 <first : 6 -33 0 1684 Rxc1 Qd2 
544683 <first : 7 -33 1 4153 Rxc1 Qd2 
544693 <first : 8 -33 2 7090 Rxc1 Qd2 
544803 <first : 9 -33 13 37280 Rxc1 Qd2 
546065 <first : 10 -43 140 378107 Rxc1 Qd2 Qd1 O-O-O Qe1 Bc5 Qxd2 
552444 <first : 11 -40 777 2053080 Rxc1 Qd2 Qd1 O-O-O Qe1 Bc5 f3 Rg8 Rh2 Qd3 Qe2 Qxe2 Kxe2 
565753 <first : move a1c1
565753 >second: time 64271
otim 60307
565753 >second: usermove 565753 >second: a1c1
565763 <second: 2 59 0 1 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 
565763 <second: 3 59 0 54 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 
565773 <second: 4 59 0 54 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 
565773 <second: 5 59 0 54 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 
565773 <second: 6 59 0 55 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 
565773 <second: 7 59 0 56 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 
565773 <second: 8 59 0 56 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 
566665 <second: 9 66 88 473172 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 c5 
569889 <second: 10 57 412 1869343 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 Bg5 Rcf1 
576769 <second: 11 64 1100 3843380 Qd2 Qd1 Qd3+ Qe2 O-O Nb4 Qxe2+ Kxe2 Bg5 Rcf1 c5 
576769 <second: move d8d2
Interrupting first
576769 >first : time 60307
otim 63169
576769 >first : d8d2
577000 <first : 5 -67 0 1640 Qd1 O-O-O 
577000 <first : 6 -67 1 2640 Qd1 O-O-O 
577010 <first : 7 -67 1 3904 Qd1 O-O-O 
577020 <first : 8 -67 3 7729 Qd1 O-O-O 
577050 <first : 9 -67 6 17425 Qd1 O-O-O 
577150 <first : 10 -67 16 45922 Qd1 O-O-O 
584691 <first : 11 -137 770 2087027 Rd1 Qxc2 Qd7 
590179 <first : 12 -227 1317 3604425 Rd1 Qxc2 Qd7 
597699 <first : move c1d1
597699 >second: time 63169
otim 58214
597699 >second: usermove 597699 >second: c1d1
597729 <second: 2 311 2 408 Qxc2 Qd7+ Kf8 Qxc6 Kg7 Rd7 Rac8 f4 
597729 <second: 3 300 2 299 Qxc2 Qd7+ Kf8 Qxc6 Kg7 Rd7 Rac8 f4 
597749 <second: 4 300 2 1100 Qxc2 Qd7+ Kf8 Re1 
597749 <second: 5 315 5 10806 Qxc2 a3 Bc5 Qd7+ Kf8 
597830 <second: 6 327 13 40032 Qxc2 a3 Bc5 Qd7+ Kf8 f3 
598060 <second: 7 330 36 110731 Qxc2 Qd7+ Kf8 Re1 Qd3+ Qxd3 cxd3 
598440 <second: 8 332 73 202241 Qxc2 Qe2 Qxe2+ Kxe2 O-O Rd7 Bc5 Ke1 
599702 <second: 9 339 200 625176 Qxc2 Qe2 Qxe2+ Kxe2 O-O Rd7 Bc5 Ke1 Rac8 
602076 <second: 10 330 435 1267951 Qxc2 Qe2 Qxe2+ Kxe2 O-O Kf1 Bc5 Kg1 Rad8 Rxd8 
609997 <second: 11 330 1229 4080381 Qxc2 Qe2 Qxe2+ Kxe2 O-O Kf1 Bc5 Kg1 Rad8 Rxd8 Rxd8 
609997 <second: move d2c2

[Rudolf Posch]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Rudolf Posch at 14. July 2004 15:57:
Als Antwort auf:/In reply to: ...(bug in RDChess?) Note for Rudolf! (debug snippet) geschrieben von:/posted by: Günther Simon at 10 July 2004 15:06:17:

....>>(search bug in RDChess or a strange evaluation function? Move 19 blunders a knight)

Thanks for the hint Alejandro! It's a pity but I am too busy with
work currently, therefore I cant check the games for more than
wrong result claims, time losses and such things.
Here is the debug part for the blunder ...

Thanks Günter and Alejandro for your debug info:
577150